Atmospheric pressure plasma chemical vapor deposition reactor for 100 mm wafers, optimized for minimum contamination at low gas flow rates

Gas discharge plasmas used for thinfilm deposition by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) must be devoid of contaminants, like dust or active species which disturb the intended chemical reaction. In atmospheric pressure plasma systems employing an inert gas, the main source of such contamination is the residual air inside the system. To enable the construction of an atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) system with minimal contamination, we have carried out fluid dynamic simulation of the APP chamber into which an inert gas is injected at different mass flow rates. On the basis of the simulation results, we have designed and built a simple, scaled APP system, which is capable of holding a 100 mm substrate wafer, so that the presence of air (contamination) in the APP chamber is minimized with as low a flow rate of argon as possible. This is examined systematically by examining optical emission from the plasma as a function of inert gas flow rate. It is found that optical emission from the plasma shows the presence of atmospheric air, if the inlet argon flow rate is lowered below 300 sccm. That there is minimal contamination of the APP reactor built here, was verified by conducting an atmospheric pressure PECVD process under acetylene flow, combined with argon flow at 100 sccm and 500 sccm. The deposition of a polymer coating is confirmed by infrared spectroscopy. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy shows that the polymer coating contains only 5% of oxygen, which is comparable to the oxygen content in polymer deposits obtained in low-pressure PECVD systems. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

[1]  M. Turner,et al.  Generation of reactive species by an atmospheric pressure plasma jet , 2014 .

[2]  W. Siemens,et al.  Ueber die elektrostatische Induction und die Verzögerung des Stroms in Flaschendrähten , 1857 .

[3]  N. Bibinov,et al.  Spectroscopic characterization of an atmospheric pressure μ-jet plasma source , 2011, 1104.3786.

[4]  N. Bibinov,et al.  1 Spectroscopic characterization of atmospheric pressure μ-jet plasma source , 2011 .

[5]  Ladislav Bardos,et al.  Cold atmospheric plasma: Sources, processes, and applications , 2010 .

[6]  U. Kogelschatz Dielectric-Barrier Discharges: Their History, Discharge Physics, and Industrial Applications , 2003 .

[7]  Christophe Leys,et al.  Atmospheric pressure plasma jet in Ar and Ar/H2O mixtures: Optical emission spectroscopy and temperature measurements , 2010 .

[8]  R. Satti,et al.  Flow structure in the near-field of buoyant low-density gas jets , 2006 .

[9]  C. Leys,et al.  Characterization of an atmospheric helium plasma jet by relative and absolute optical emission spectroscopy , 2012 .

[10]  Pascal Tristant,et al.  Atmospheric pressure plasmas: A review , 2006 .

[11]  J. L. Vossen,et al.  II-1 – Glow Discharge Sputter Deposition , 1978 .

[12]  P. Papakonstantinou,et al.  Electronic structure and bonding properties of Si-doped hydrogenated amorphous carbon films , 2004 .

[13]  V. Anand,et al.  On the Purity of Atmospheric Glow-Discharge Plasma , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[14]  Tomoyuki Murakami,et al.  Chemical kinetics and reactive species in atmospheric pressure helium–oxygen plasmas with humid-air impurities , 2012 .

[15]  Jun‐Seok Oh,et al.  Time-resolved mass spectroscopic studies of an atmospheric-pressure helium microplasma jet , 2011 .