Models of the effects of threshold on loudness growth and summation.

The present paper extends previous efforts to compare models of additivity of masking in normal and impaired listeners to measures of loudness. A model that provides a good account of additivity of masking for normal and impaired listeners, the modified power-law model with compressed internal noise, also provides a good description of basic loudness data from normal and impaired listeners. This model has been discussed frequently in the literature on loudness as one means of correcting loudness functions near threshold, but has not been widely accepted. The applicability of this model to loudness growth and the summation of loudness, both monaurally and binaurally, is evaluated and compared to the more generally accepted alternative. The ability of the model reported here to account for growth of loudness near threshold, as well as the additivity of masking, suggests a need to reconsider its application to loudness data, as well as a need to reconsider the relation between loudness and masking.

[1]  L E Marks,et al.  Binaural summation of the loudness of pure tones. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R J IRWIN.  BINAURAL SUMMATION OF THERMAL NOISES OF EQUAL AND UNEQUAL POWER IN EACH EAR. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  F. Miskolczy-Fodor,et al.  Relation between Loudness and Duration of Tonal Pulses. III. Response in Cases of Abnormal Loudness Function , 1960 .

[4]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On scales of sensation: Prolegomena to any future psychophysics that will be able to come forth as science , 1974 .

[5]  K. Keen.  Preservation of constant loudness with interaural amplitude asymmetry. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  E. Galanter,et al.  The relation between category and magnitude scales of loudness. , 1961, Psychological review.

[7]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Analysis of Some Auditory Characteristics. , 1963 .

[8]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. VIII. Loudness comparisons between different types of stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S. S. Stevens.  On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[10]  M J Penner,et al.  The coding of intensity and the interaction of forward and backward masking. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Hall,et al.  Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  J. Lochner,et al.  Form of the Loudness Function in the Presence of Masking Noise , 1961 .

[13]  S. S. Stevens.  Tactile vibration: dynamics of sensory intensity. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  L. Marks,et al.  The form of the psychophysical function near threshold , 1968 .

[15]  P. Bonding.  Critical bandwidth in loudness summation in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[16]  D. W. Robinson,et al.  A re-determination of the equal-loudness relations for pure tones , 1956 .

[17]  W. E. Dawson,et al.  Inverse attribute functions and the proposed modifications of the power law , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  R. Luce,et al.  On the possible psychophysical laws. , 1959, Psychological review.

[19]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  A theory of loudness and loudness judgments. , 1979 .

[20]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Erratum: ‘‘Modeling sensorineural hearing loss. I. Model and retrospective evaluation’’ [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 188–202 (1988)] , 1988 .

[21]  W. Larkin,et al.  Partial masking in electrocutaneous sensation: A model for sensation matching, with applications to loudness recruitment , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  D. Jameson,et al.  Theory of brightness and color contrast in human vision. , 1964, Vision research.

[23]  S. S. Stevens.  On the brightness of lights and loudness of sounds , 1953 .

[24]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Additivity of simultaneous masking. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Nonlinearities in the coding of intensity within the context of a temporal summation model. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Loudness Function of a 1000‐cps Tone in the Presence of a Masking Noise , 1964 .

[27]  S. S. Stevens.  Power‐Group Transformations under Glare, Masking, and Recruitment , 1966 .

[28]  R A Lutfi.  A power-law transformation predicting masking by sounds with complex spectra. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On the “Psychophysical Law.” , 1960 .

[30]  Lidia W. Lee,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Auditory Perception , 1992 .

[31]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Loudness determination at low sound frequencies. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  R. F. Fagot,et al.  An experimental comparison of stimulus and response translated power functions for brightness , 1968 .

[33]  A. A. Wright,et al.  Equal loudness contours derived from sensory magnitude judgments. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Binaural Summation of Loudness , 1960 .

[35]  L. Humes,et al.  Models of the additivity of masking. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Mark B. Gardner,et al.  The Dependence of Hearing Impairment on Sound Intensity , 1937 .

[37]  Irwin Rj,et al.  BINAURAL SUMMATION OF THERMAL NOISES OF EQUAL AND UNEQUAL POWER IN EACH EAR. , 1965 .

[38]  B. Scharf,et al.  Dichotic Summation of Loudness over Time , 1970 .

[39]  R. Hellman,et al.  Loudness relations for individuals and groups in normal and impaired hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.