Does Domain Knowledge Moderate Involvement of Working Memory Capacity in Higher-Level Cognition? A Test of Three Models.

Research suggests that both working memory capacity and domain knowledge contribute to individual differences in higher-level cognition. This study evaluated three hypotheses concerning the interplay between these factors. The compensation hypothesis predicts that domain knowledge attenuates the influence of working memory capacity on higher-level cognition, whereas the rich-get-richer hypothesis predicts that working memory capacity enhances use of domain knowledge. The independent influences hypothesis states simply that working memory capacity and domain knowledge make additive contributions to higher-level cognition. Participants representing wide ranges of working memory capacity and knowledge of baseball performed tasks that emphasized keeping track of information in a dynamic environment. The baseball task involved tracking the movements of baseball players on a baseball diamond. The spaceship task was structurally isomorphic to this task but its content was arbitrary. Results revealed greater use of baseball knowledge in the baseball task than in the spaceship task. However, even at high levels of baseball knowledge, this knowledge use did not alter the relationship between working memory capacity and task performance. This finding is inconsistent with compensation and rich-get-richer hypotheses. Instead, it suggests that working memory capacity and domain knowledge may operate independently under certain conditions.

[1]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Effects of Domain Knowledge, Working Memory Capacity, and Age on Cognitive Performance: An Investigation of the Knowledge-Is-Power Hypothesis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Lauren Leslie,et al.  Effect of Prior Knowledge on Good and Poor Readers' Memory of Text. , 1988 .

[3]  Pamela K. Smith,et al.  Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[4]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Effects of increased processing demands on age differences in working memory. , 1990 .

[5]  Carol H. Walker,et al.  Relative Importance of Domain Knowledge and Overall Aptitude on Acquisition of Domain-Related Information , 1987 .

[6]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .

[7]  C. Judd,et al.  Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[10]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[11]  Priti Shah,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Models of Working Memory: An Introduction , 1999 .

[12]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. , 1991 .

[13]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[14]  J. Carroll.  Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[15]  Adult age differences in memory in relation to availability and accessibility of knowledge-based schemas. , 1990 .

[16]  Frank R. Yekovich,et al.  The Influence of Domain Knowledge on Inferencing In Low-Aptitude Individuals , 1990 .

[17]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g , 2004 .

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  The mind's eye in chess. , 1973 .

[19]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  A. Miyake,et al.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  V. Hall,et al.  Relative Importance of Aptitude and Prior Domain Knowledge on Immediate and Delayed Posttests. , 1992 .

[22]  David J. Therriault,et al.  A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .

[23]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  David Z. Hambrick.  Why are some people more knowledgeable than others? A longitudinal study of knowledge acquisition , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[26]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[27]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct , 2000 .

[28]  Wolfgang Schneider,et al.  The knowledge base and text recall: evidence from a short-term longitudinal study , 1989 .

[29]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Processing Components of College-Level Reading Comprehension. , 1994 .

[31]  W. Schneider,et al.  The Effects of Expertise and IQ on Children's Memory: When Knowledge is, and When it is Not Enough , 1996 .

[32]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Inferences and text comprehension , 1990 .

[33]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[34]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory in problem solving , 2003 .

[35]  E. Hunt.  Mechanics of Verbal Ability. , 1978 .

[36]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Training for Performance - Principles of Applied Human Learning - Morrison,Je , 1993 .

[37]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[38]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning : The Componential Analysis of Human Abilities , 1977 .

[39]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill , 1990 .

[40]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[41]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A Trading Relationship between Reading Skill and Domain Knowledge in Children's Text Comprehension. , 1995 .

[42]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[43]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1999 .

[44]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  T. Salthouse,et al.  The effects of age and experience on memory for visually presented music. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[46]  Young Woo Sohn,et al.  Roles of working memory capacity and long-term working memory skill in complex task performance , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[47]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[48]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination , 2003 .

[49]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[51]  L. Cronbach.  The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[52]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Aptitude Testing Inspired by Information Processing: A Test of the Four-Sources Model , 1993 .

[53]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[54]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  Working-memory capacity explains reasoning abilityand a little bit more , 2002 .

[55]  V. Leirer,et al.  Aging, expertise, and narrative processing. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[56]  W. Schneider,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge and Memory Performance: A Comparison of High- and Low-Aptitude Children , 1989 .

[57]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Individual differences in reprocessing of text. , 1992 .

[58]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Learning from Instructional Text: Test of an Individual-Differences Model. , 1998 .

[59]  K. Klein,et al.  The reliability and stability of the turner and Engle working memory task , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[60]  E. Meinz,et al.  Experience-based attenuation of age-related differences in music cognition tasks. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[61]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[62]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[63]  L. Miller,et al.  The effects of age and domain knowledge on text processing. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[64]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! , 1990 .

[65]  T. Salthouse.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.