Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will E-Government Be Different?

This article examines the theoretical ideal of information technology as an instrument of administrative reform and examines the extent to which that ideal has been achieved in the United States. It takes a look at the findings from research about the use and impacts of information technology from the time of the mainframe computer through the PC revolution to the current era of the Internet and e-government. It then concludes that information technology has never been an instrument of administrative reform; rather, it has been used to reinforce existing administrative and political arrangements. It assesses why this is the case and draws conclusions about what should be expected with future applications of information technologies — in the time after e-government. It concludes with a discussion of the early evidence about newer applications for automated service delivery, 24/7 e-government, and e-democracy.

[1]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Middle management downsizing: an empirical investigation of the impact of information technology , 1997 .

[2]  Jacques Berleur,et al.  Human Choice and Computers , 2002, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[3]  William Creager,et al.  Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) , 2001 .

[4]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[5]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The dynamics of change in computing use: A theoretical framework , 1986 .

[6]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Modeling as Negotiating: The Political Dynamics of Computer Models in the Policy Process , 1985 .

[7]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? , 2004, CSCW.

[9]  Rob Kling,et al.  Automated welfare client-tracking and service integration: the political economy of computing , 1978, CACM.

[10]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Computing and Public Organizations , 1986 .

[11]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  The impact of information technology on the middle management workforce : an empirical investigation , 1990 .

[12]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Technological Innovation in American Local Governments: The Case of Computing , 1980 .

[13]  G. Garson,et al.  Digital Government: Principles and Best Practices , 2003 .

[14]  K. Kraemer,et al.  REQUIEM FOR USAC , 1979 .

[15]  Stephen H. Holden,et al.  The evolution of information technology management at the federal level: implications for public administration , 1999 .

[16]  William H. Dutton,et al.  Transforming Enterprise , 2004 .

[17]  John Leslie King,et al.  Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options , 1983, CSUR.

[18]  D. Norris,et al.  Electronic Government at the Local Level , 2003 .

[19]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Political Character of Computerization in Service Organizations: Citizen Interests or Bureaucratic Control , 1983 .

[20]  Donald F. Norris.  Electronic Government at the American Grassroots , 2004, DG.O.

[21]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Wired Cities: Shaping the Future of Communications , 1987 .

[22]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Electronic Democracy at the American Grassroots , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[23]  Joey F. George,et al.  Examining the computing and centralization debate , 1991, CACM.

[24]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[25]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know , 1984, CACM.

[26]  Geunjoo Lee,et al.  Are Computers Boosting Productivity?: A Test of the Paradox in State Governments , 1999 .

[27]  M. Gascó.  New Technologies and Institutional Change in Public Administration , 2003 .

[28]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[29]  William Lehr,et al.  Computer Use and Productivity Growth in federal Government Agencies , 1996 .

[30]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Impacts of IT on Firm and Industry Structure: The Personal Computer Industry , 2005 .

[31]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  Computer Use and Productivity Growth in Federal Government Agencies, 1987 to 1992 , 1996 .

[32]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Why we blog , 2004, CACM.

[33]  William H. Dutton,et al.  Automotive Informatics: Information Technology and Enterprise Transformation in the Automobile Industry , 2004 .

[34]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Computer information systems and organization structure , 1981, CACM.

[35]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[36]  G. Taylor.  People and Computers , 1991 .

[37]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Lessons from the US growth resurgence , 2003 .

[38]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information Technology and Middle Management Downsizing: A Tale of Two Cities , 1997 .

[39]  D. West.  E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[40]  S. Caudle.  Managing Information Resources in State Government , 1990 .

[41]  G. Garson,et al.  The promise of digital government , 2004 .

[42]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Federal Push to Bring Computer Applications to Local Governments , 1979 .

[43]  Brian Kahin,et al.  First International Conference on the Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology , 2003 .

[44]  Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko,et al.  Encyclopedia of Digital Government , 2006 .

[45]  A. Gore.  From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less , 2001 .

[46]  Charles Kaylor,et al.  Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[47]  Donald A. Marchand,et al.  Managing Information Resources: New Directions in State Government. , 1989 .

[48]  C. H. Kriebel.  Management information systems , 1970, ACM '70.

[49]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An Empirical Test. , 1990 .

[50]  K. Kraemer,et al.  Datawars: The Politics of Modeling in Federal Policymaking , 1987 .

[51]  S. Klatzky,et al.  Automation, Size, and the Locus of Decision Making: The Cascade Effect , 1970 .

[52]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  COMPUTERS AND THE CONSTITUTION - A HELPFUL, HARMFUL OR HARMLESS RELATIONSHIP , 1987 .

[53]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Management utilization of computers in American local governments , 1978, CACM.

[54]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Technology and Urban Management , 1977 .

[55]  George R. S. Weir,et al.  People and Computers IX: Crafting Interaction: Styles, Metaphors, Modalities and Agents , 1994 .

[56]  C. Urquhart,et al.  The impact of information. , 1997, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[57]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Dynamics of Computing , 1985 .

[58]  W. F. Christopher,et al.  Management for the 1980s , 1980 .