Validating NEXRAD MPE and Stage III precipitation products for uniform rainfall on the Upper Guadalupe River Basin of the Texas Hill Country

Summary This study examines the performance of the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) Multisensor Precipitation Estimator (MPE) and Stage III precipitation products, using a high-density rain gauge network located on the Upper Guadalupe River Basin of the Texas Hill Country. As point-area representativeness error of gauge rainfall is a major concern in assessment of radar rainfall estimation, this study develops a new method to automatically select uniform rainfall events based on coefficient of variation criterion of 3 by 3 radar cells. Only gauge observations of those uniform rainfall events are used as ground truth to evaluate radar rainfall estimation. This study proposes a new parameter probability of rain detection (POD) instead of the conditional probability of rain detection (CPOD) commonly used in previous studies to assess the capability that a radar or gauge detects rainfall. Results suggest that: (1) gauge observations of uniform rainfall better represent ground truth of a 4 × 4 km 2 radar cell than non-uniform rainfall; (2) the MPE has higher capability of rain detection than either gauge-only or Stage III; (3) the MPE has much higher linear correlation and lower mean relative difference with gauge measurements than the Stage III does; (4) the Stage III tends to overestimate precipitation (20%), but the MPE tends to underestimate (7%).

[1]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Radar–Rain Gauge Comparisons under Observational Uncertainties , 1999 .

[2]  D. Legates,et al.  Precipitation measurement biases in the United States , 1993 .

[3]  W. Krajewski,et al.  On the estimation of radar rainfall error variance , 1999 .

[4]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Comparison of raingage and WSR-88D Stage III precipitation data over the Texas-Gulf basin , 2004 .

[5]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Evaluating NEXRAD Multisensor Precipitation Estimates for Operational Hydrologic Forecasting , 2000 .

[6]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall , 2004 .

[7]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Evaluation of Biases of Satellite Rainfall Estimation Algorithms over the Continental United States , 2002 .

[8]  W. Schmid,et al.  Verifying warnings for point precipitation , 2005 .

[9]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  GIS-based NEXRAD Stage III precipitation database: automated approaches for data processing and visualization , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[10]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Radar hydrology: rainfall estimation. , 2002 .

[11]  P. E. Johnston,et al.  Development and application of Doppler radar profilers to ground validation of satellite precipitation measurements , 1999 .

[12]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Zero-covariance hypothesis in the error variance separation method of radar rainfall verification , 2003 .

[13]  David R. Legates,et al.  Real-Time Calibration of Radar Precipitation Estimates , 2000 .

[14]  C. Willmott.  Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance , 1982 .

[15]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of the TRMM Ground-Validation Radar-Rainfall Products: Application to the TEFLUN-B Field Campaign , 2002 .

[16]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  EVALUATION OF NEXRAD STAGE III PRECIPITATION DATA OVER A SEMIARID REGION 1 , 2006 .

[17]  M. Kitchen,et al.  Representativeness errors in comparisons between radar and gauge measurements of rainfall , 1992 .

[18]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs , 1997 .

[19]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  An Intercomparison Study of NEXRAD Precipitation Estimates , 1996 .

[20]  R. Fulton.  ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE WSR-88D RADAR RAINFALL ESTIMATION IN THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE , 2002 .