Curve Number Estimation of Ungauged Catchments considering Characteristics of Rainfall and Catchment

The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (CN) method is widely used to calculate the flood runoff in ungauged catchments. However, the existing CN calculation method has a disadvantage in that it cannot calculate the CNs considering the spatiotemporal variability of rainfall in the ungauged catchments. In this study, the authors used a distributed rainfall-runoff model and a simple runoff generation method to generate the hourly runoffs of the ungauged catchments considering the spatiotemporal variability of rainfall, and estimate the CNs of the ungauged catchments using the generated runoff and the CN back calculation method. As a result of calculating the CNs of the ungauged catchments for past 20 rainfall events, the CNs had a large variability even in the same catchment. In addition, the mean CNs for the 20 rainfall events of independent ungauged catchments differed even if the ungauged catchments were close to each other. The method of estimating the CNs of the ungauged catchments presented in this study properly reflects the characteristics of actual rainfall and catchment, and thus can be usefully used to estimate valid CN.

[1]  K. Beven.  Kinematic subsurface stormflow , 1981 .

[2]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  Approach to Confidence Interval Estimation for Curve Numbers , 2002 .

[3]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Regional calibration of catchment models: Potential for ungauged catchments , 2007 .

[4]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model , 2001 .

[5]  A. El-Hames.  An empirical method for peak discharge prediction in ungauged arid and semi-arid region catchments based on morphological parameters and SCS curve number , 2012 .

[6]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[7]  Hyosang Lee,et al.  Selection of conceptual models for regionalisation of the rainfall-runoff relationship , 2005 .

[8]  James V. Bonta,et al.  Determination of Watershed Curve Number Using Derived Distributions , 1997 .

[9]  M. R. Adams,et al.  Runoff Curve Numbers for 10 Small Forested Watersheds in the Mountains of the Eastern United States , 2012 .

[10]  G. W. Titmarsh,et al.  CALIBRATION PROCEDURES FOR RATIONAL AND USSCS DESIGN FLOOD METHODS , 1996 .

[11]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Curve Number Hydrology : State of the Practice , 2008 .

[12]  Nicolás Velásquez Girón,et al.  Evaluation of existing relations between convective systems and extreme events in tropical catchments of the Andean region , 2020 .

[13]  S. Poongothai,et al.  Spatial Mapping of Runoff from a Watershed Using SCS-CN Method with Remote Sensing and GIS , 2012 .

[14]  M. Walter,et al.  Improving runoff risk estimates: Formulating runoff as a bivariate process using the SCS curve number method , 2009 .

[15]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[16]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[17]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[18]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Improved Prediction of Storm Runoff in Mountain Watersheds , 1973 .

[19]  K. N. Tiwari,et al.  RS and Geographical Information System–Based Evaluation of Distributed and Composite Curve Number Techniques , 2012 .

[20]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Results of the DMIP 2 Oklahoma experiments , 2012 .

[21]  V. Ponce,et al.  Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity? , 1996 .

[22]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  Green‐Ampt Curve‐Number mixed procedure as an empirical tool for rainfall–runoff modelling in small and ungauged basins , 2013 .

[23]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Curve Number Determination Methods and Uncertainty in Hydrologic Soil Groups from Semiarid Watershed Data , 2012 .

[24]  Allen T. Hjelmfelt,et al.  Runoff Probability, Storm Depth, and Curve Numbers , 1985 .

[25]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data , 1993 .

[26]  Kenneth G. Renard,et al.  Runoff Curve Number Variation with Drainage Area, Walnut Gulch, Arizona , 1996 .

[27]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  A proposed index for comparing hydrographs , 1975 .

[28]  Kyung-Tak Kim,et al.  Multi‐site calibration using a grid‐based event rainfall–runoff model: a case study of the upstream areas of the Nakdong River basin in Korea , 2015 .

[29]  Chittaranjan Ray,et al.  Calibration and validation of a physically distributed hydrological model, MIKE SHE, to predict streamflow at high frequency in a flashy mountainous Hawaii stream , 2006 .

[30]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[31]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[32]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Construction, Calibration And Validation of Hydrological Models , 1990 .