Devaluation of low-quality food during early experience by sheep.

A ruminant's early experience with low-quality food (LQF) is expected to increase its acceptance and preference in adulthood. Contrarily, we found that experienced sheep (ES) exposed to mature oat hay early in life ate less of this LQF than inexperienced sheep (IS). A possibility is that ES might have devaluated the LQF through continuous comparisons against high-quality food (HQF) supplements (sunflower meal and ground corn) that were simultaneously available during early experience. In this study, we tested the devaluation hypothesis with a successive negative contrast (SNC) procedure. In a consummatory SNC procedure, 'shift' subjects are unexpectedly changed from HQF to LQF, and their consumption is then compared against the consumption of 'unshift' subjects that receive LQF all throughout the SNC procedure. The magnitude of the difference in consumption between preshift and postshift is regarded as a measure of the degree to which both foods (HQF and LQF) are perceived to differ hedonically. When sheep from our previous study were 300 days old, both ES and IS were randomly assigned to either shift (ES-S and IS-S) or unshift conditions (ES-U and IS-U; n = 6 in each group). Groups ES-S and IS-S were fed HQF (alfalfa hay) during the preshift phase, and then suddenly changed to LQF (oat hay) in the postshift phase. Groups ES-U and IS-U (controls) were fed only LQF throughout the SNC procedure. Subjects in ES-S showed a significantly lower intake of LQF than those in ES-U in the first postshift session (i.e. they showed an SNC effect), which was not observed in IS. These results agree with ES subjects having devalued LQF during early experience. We discuss the possibility that high levels of nutrient supplementation can result in devaluation of LQF (i.e. decrease in preference and acceptance), whereas restricted levels of supplementation may promote a positive experience with LQF.

[1]  J. Villalba,et al.  Role of early experience in the development of preference for low-quality food in sheep. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[2]  A. Balogh,et al.  Consummatory simultaneous positive and negative contrast in fallow deer: implications for selectivity , 2009 .

[3]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Time for some a priori thinking about post hoc testing , 2008 .

[4]  D. Zellner,et al.  Contextual influences on liking and preference , 2007, Appetite.

[5]  O. Leimar,et al.  A test of simultaneous and successive negative contrast in fallow deer foraging behaviour , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  M. Papini,et al.  Scaling Relative Incentive Value in Consummatory Behavior. , 2006 .

[7]  F. Provenza,et al.  Influence of Stock Density and Rate and Temporal Patterns of Forage Allocation on the Diet Mixing Behavior of Sheep Grazing Sagebrush Steppe , 2006 .

[8]  F. Provenza,et al.  Initial conditions and temporal delays influence preference for foods high in tannins and for foraging locations with and without foods high in tannins by sheep , 2006 .

[9]  F. Provenza,et al.  Nutritional context influences preferences of lambs for foods with plant secondary metabolites , 2005 .

[10]  F. Provenza,et al.  Experience Influences Diet Mixing by Herbivores: Implications for Plant Biochemical Diversity , 2004 .

[11]  M. Bateson.  Mechanisms of decision-making and the interpretation of choice tests , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[12]  F. Provenza,et al.  Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity , 2003 .

[13]  T. Zentall,et al.  Simultaneous discrimination learning: Stimulus interactions , 2001 .

[14]  Matthew R. Tinsley,et al.  Incentive downshifts evoke search repertoires in rats. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  R C Littell,et al.  Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[16]  A. Illius,et al.  Optimal diet choice for large herbivores: an extended contingency model , 1998 .

[17]  J. Villalba,et al.  Effects of early experience on voluntary intake of low-quality roughage by sheep. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[18]  R. J. Orr,et al.  Fasting affects intake behaviour and diet preference of grazing sheep , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  F. Provenza,et al.  Experience early in life affects voluntary intake of blackbrush by goats , 1991, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[20]  F. Provenza,et al.  The establishment and persistence of food preferences in lambs exposed to selected foods. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[21]  F. Provenza,et al.  Diet learning by domestic ruminants: Theory, evidence and practical implications , 1987 .

[22]  C. Flaherty,et al.  Gustatory contrast in rats , 1979 .

[23]  C. Flaherty,et al.  Bidirectional contrast, matching, and power functions obtained in sucrose consumption by rats , 1978 .

[24]  C. Flaherty,et al.  Open-Field Behaviors Elicited by Reward Reduction , 1978 .

[25]  C. Flaherty,et al.  Within-subjects positive and negative contrast effects in rats. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[26]  A. Rosati,et al.  Rational decisions: The adaptive nature of context-dependent choice , 2009 .

[27]  M. Freer,et al.  Principles of supplementary feeding in sheep-grazing systems. , 2002 .

[28]  J. Moore,et al.  Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performance. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[29]  M. Freer,et al.  Responses to supplements by weaned lambs grazing mature pasture or eating hay in yards , 1985 .