Comparison of variable selection techniques for data envelopment analysis in a retail bank

If there are too few units compared to inputs and outputs, the efficiency evaluation based upon the data envelopment analysis suffers from a lack of discrimination. The literature has proposed various statistical techniques when the value judgments do not guide the selection of the inputs/outputs. Two techniques, the variable reduction procedure of Jenkins and Anderson (2003) and the approach based upon the efficiency contribution measure of Pastor, Ruiz, and Sirvent (2002), were compared in an empirical retail bank context. The objective was to select a representative set of outputs from the services the bank provides. As the techniques take different approaches to selecting influential variables, the output sets proposed by the techniques diverged. This created some significant differences in the efficiency evaluations of the bank branches. The bank management gave feedback on the techniques and the results from a practical perspective. The techniques led to different managerial interpretations of the performance complementing each other. Thus, the techniques can be utilized to evaluate the units from multiple perspectives.

[1]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance: Modeling Considerations and Approaches , 2004 .

[3]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Combining ranking scales and selecting variables in the DEA context: the case of industrial branches , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Yiwen Bian,et al.  A Gram-Schmidt process based approach for improving DEA discrimination in the presence of large dimensionality of data set , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  A Monte Carlo Evaluation of several Tests for the Selection of Variables in Dea Models , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[7]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  A Statistical Test for Nested Radial Dea Models , 2002, Oper. Res..

[8]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Impact Assessment of Input Omission on Dea , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[9]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[10]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  Variables reduction in data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[11]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[12]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA-DEA or variable reduction , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Larry Jenkins,et al.  A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Comparative efficiency analysis of Portuguese bank branches , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[17]  Phillip Fanchon,et al.  Variable selection for dynamic measures of efficiency in the computer industry , 2003 .

[18]  T. Ueda,et al.  APPLICATION OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS FOR PARSIMONIOUS SUMMARIZATION OF DEA INPUTS AND/OR OUTPUTS , 1997 .

[19]  Merja Halme,et al.  Bank branch sales evaluation using extended value efficiency analysis , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Applied data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[21]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[22]  T. J. Cook,et al.  Evaluating the administrative efficiency of courts , 1982 .

[23]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Hypothesis tests using data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[24]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis , 2013 .

[25]  Janet M. Wagner,et al.  Stepwise selection of variables in data envelopment analysis: Procedures and managerial perspectives , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Andrew L. Johnson,et al.  The dynamics of performance space of Major League Baseball pitchers 1871–2006 , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[27]  E. Thanassoulis,et al.  Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: some practical suggestions , 2007 .

[28]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  TESTING RESTRICTIONS IN NONPARAMETRIC EFFICIENCY MODELS , 2001 .

[29]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Tests of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1990, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Andrew L. Johnson,et al.  Guidelines for using variable selection techniques in data envelopment analysis , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Intertemporal efficiency analysis of sales teams of a bank: Stochastic semi-nonparametric approach. , 2013 .

[32]  Mithun J. Sharma,et al.  Stepwise regression data envelopment analysis for variable reduction , 2015, Appl. Math. Comput..

[33]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Statistical Tests Based on Dea Efficiency Scores , 2011 .

[34]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[35]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[36]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  M. I. González-Bravo,et al.  Prior-Ratio-Analysis procedure to improve data envelopment analysis for performance measurement , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[38]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..