Which Factors Can Protect Against Range Stress in Everyday Usage of Battery Electric Vehicles? Toward Enhancing Sustainability of Electric Mobility Systems

Objective: The objective of the present research was to advance understanding of factors that can protect against range anxiety, specifically range stress in everyday usage of battery electric vehicles (BEVs). Background: Range anxiety is a major barrier to the broad adoption of sustainable electric mobility systems. To develop strategies aimed at overcoming range anxiety, a clear understanding of this phenomenon and influencing factors is needed. Method: We examined range anxiety in the form of everyday range stress (ERS) in a field study setting. Seventy-two customers leased a BEV for 3 months. The field study was specifically designed to enable examination of factors that can contribute to lower ERS. In particular, study design and sample recruitment were targeted at generating vehicle usage profiles that would lead to relatively frequent experience of situations requiring active management of range resources and thereby potentially leading to experienced range stress. Results: Less frequent encounter with critical range situations, higher practical experience, subjective range competence, tolerance of low range, and experienced trustworthiness of the range estimation system were related to lower ERS. Moreover, range stress was found to be related to range satisfaction and BEV acceptance. Conclusion: The results underline the importance of the human factors perspective to overcome range anxiety and enhance sustainability of electric mobility systems. Application: Trustworthiness should be employed as a key benchmark variable in the design of range estimation systems, and assistance systems should target increasing drivers’ adaptive capacity (i.e., resilience) to cope with critical range situations.

[1]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Transformations of the energy system in the context of the decarbonisation of the EU economy in the , 2012 .

[2]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Understanding charging behaviour of electric vehicle users , 2013 .

[3]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[4]  Christine Chauvin,et al.  Articulating the Differences Between Safety and Resilience: The Decision-Making Process of Professional Sea-Fishing Skippers , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems , 2000 .

[6]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Thomas Franke,et al.  The Timeframe of Adaptation to Electric Vehicle Range , 2013, HCI.

[8]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Maria Nilsson,et al.  European Research Project on ICT for Electric Vehicles , 2012 .

[10]  Martin Steinert,et al.  Displayed Uncertainty Improves Driving Experience and Behavior: The Case of Range Anxiety in an Electric Car , 2015, CHI.

[11]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[12]  Madlen Günther,et al.  Advancing electric vehicle range displays for enhanced user experience: the relevance of trust and adaptability , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[13]  Lili Li,et al.  Energy and environmental impact of battery electric vehicle range in China , 2015 .

[14]  MMag. Matthias Beggiato,et al.  Changes in motivational and higher level cognitive processes when interacting with in-vehicle automation , 2014 .

[15]  P. Hancock,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention , 1989, Human factors.

[16]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Transport electrification: A key element for energy system transformation and climate stabilization , 2014, Climatic Change.

[17]  Johan Bergström,et al.  On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: A literature review , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Eric Barboni,et al.  Designing for resilience to hardware failures in interactive systems: A model and simulation-based approach , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Jochen Mayerl,et al.  Regressionsanalyse: Theorie, Technik und Anwendung , 2011 .

[20]  R. Michael Furr,et al.  A contrast analysis approach to change , 2008 .

[21]  I. Neumann,et al.  ADAPTING TO THE RANGE OF AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE – THE RELATION OF EXPERIENCE TO SUBJECTIVELY AVAILABLE MOBILITY RESOURCES , 2012 .

[22]  Roman Vilimek,et al.  Exploring Electric Driving Pleasure - The BMW EV Pilot Projects , 2013, HCI.

[23]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[24]  Marcelle C. McManus,et al.  Environmental consequences of the use of batteries in low carbon systems: The impact of battery production , 2012 .

[25]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Risk, Human Error, and System Resilience: Fundamental Ideas , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[26]  I. Neumann,et al.  Experiencing Range in an Electric Vehicle: Understanding Psychological Barriers , 2012 .

[27]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[28]  Jeremy Neubauer,et al.  Sensitivity of battery electric vehicle economics to drive patterns, vehicle range, and charge strategies , 2012 .

[29]  Paul A. Jennings,et al.  Defining the accuracy of real-world range estimations of an electric vehicle , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[30]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[31]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Green ergonomics: definition and scope , 2013, Ergonomics.

[32]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Evaluating Theories Efficiently: The Nuts and Bolts of Contrast Analysis , 2003 .

[33]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Towards Understanding Motivational and Emotional Factors in Driver Behaviour: Comfort Through Satisficing , 2007 .

[34]  Dick de Waard,et al.  A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics , 1997 .

[35]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use , 2013 .

[36]  Madlen Günther,et al.  Examining User-Range Interaction in Battery Electric Vehicles - a Field Study Approach , 2014 .

[37]  Nadine Rauh,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Electric Vehicle Driving Experience on Range Anxiety , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[38]  Dave Moore,et al.  With Eloquence and Humanity? Human Factors/Ergonomics in Sustainable Human Development , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[39]  R. Fuller Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Getting drivers to do the right thing: a review of the potential for safely reducing energy consumption through design , 2014 .

[41]  James Eaves,et al.  A cost comparison of fuel-cell and battery electric vehicles , 2004 .

[42]  Sha Fu,et al.  Long-Term Transport Energy Demand and Climate Policy: Alternative Visions on Transport Decarbonization in Energy Economy Models , 2013 .

[43]  F. E. Grubbs Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples , 1969 .

[44]  Nadine Rauh,et al.  Range comfort zone of electric vehicle users – concept and assessment , 2015 .

[45]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .