An Update on Social Media in Academic Plastic Surgery Training Programs: The Rising Trend of Likes, Shares, and Retweets.

BACKGROUND Increasing in popularity, social media provides powerful marketing and networking tools for private practice plastic surgeons. The authors sought to examine social media utilization by academic plastic surgery training programs. METHODS Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter were queried for plastic surgery training program, program director, and chief/chair accounts. Training program posts were categorized as educational, operative, social, informational, self-promotional, visiting lecturer, research-related, and other. Factors influencing total number of followers were analyzed including number of accounts followed, frequency, total number, and types of posts as well as duration of account. Other variables included geographic location, 2018 to 2019 Doximity residency ranking, and US News and World Report rankings of affiliated hospital systems and medical schools. Social media accounts were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank sum, and regression analysis. RESULTS Facebook is the most popular social media platform among chiefs/chairs (34, 35.7%), followed by Instagram (20, 21.1%) and Twitter (19, 20.0%). Facebook is used more by program directors (31, 32.6%) followed by Instagram (22, 23.1%) and Twitter (15, 15.7%). The majority of Facebook and Twitter leadership accounts are for personal use (62%-67%), whereas Twitter is used primarily for professional purposes (60%-84%). Training program social media use is rising, with Instagram and Twitter presence growing at exponential rates (R = 0.97 and 0.97, respectively). Of 95 training programs evaluated, 54 (56.8%) have Instagram accounts, 29 (30.5%) have Facebook accounts, and 27 (28.4%) have Twitter accounts. Most training programs using social media have 2 or more accounts (37, 67.3%). West coast programs have more Instagram followers than other geographic regions, significantly more than Southern programs (P = 0.05). Program accounts with more followers are affiliated with top-ranked hospitals (P = 0.0042) or top-ranked Doximity training programs (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Similar to its adoption by private practice plastic surgery, social media use in academic plastic surgery is growing exponentially. Now, over half of residency programs have Instagram accounts. Program leaders are using Facebook and Instagram primarily for personal use and Twitter for professional use. Programs affiliated with a top-ranked hospital or ranked highly by Doximity have more followers on social media.

[1]  P. Hedén,et al.  Online and Social Media Footprint of All Swedish Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons , 2019, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[2]  S. Al-Youha,et al.  The Use of Twitter by Plastic Surgery Journals , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  A Primer on Social Media Use by Young Plastic Surgeons , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  A. Gosman,et al.  Framework for the Creation of Ethical and Professional Social Media Content. , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  An assessment of social media usage by dermatology residency programs. , 2019, Dermatology online journal.

[6]  A. Forte,et al.  Meaningful Use of Social Media for Prospective Plastic Surgery Residency Candidates. , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  Sergey Y Turin,et al.  Google Ranking of Plastic Surgeons Values Social Media Presence Over Academic Pedigree and Experience , 2018, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[8]  T. Pittman,et al.  An Analysis of Plastic Surgeons' Social Media Use and Perceptions. , 2018, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[9]  Kenneth L. Fan,et al.  To Bot or Not? Challenging the Top Social Media Influencers in #PlasticSurgery , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  S. Rafaeli,et al.  Plastic Surgery Faces the Web: Analysis of the Popular Social Media for Plastic Surgeons , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[11]  J. Persing,et al.  Harnessing Social Media to Advance Research in Plastic Surgery , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  Daniel J. Gould,et al.  Insta-grated Plastic Surgery Residencies: The Rise of Social Media Use by Trainees and Responsible Guidelines for Use , 2018, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[13]  D. Haynes,et al.  Evaluation of Social Media Presence of Otolaryngology Residency Programs in the United States , 2018, JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery.

[14]  Purushottam A. Nagarkar,et al.  Eliminating Geographic Bias Improves Match Results: An Analysis of Program Preferences and Their Impact on Rank Lists and Results , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  Carly P. Smith,et al.  When Is Advertising a Plastic Surgeon's Individual "Brand" Unethical? , 2018, AMA journal of ethics.

[16]  Evelyn Ting-Hsuan Tang,et al.  Social media mediate the education of the global microsurgeons: The experience from International Microsurgery Club , 2018, Microsurgery.

[17]  Rod J. Rohrich.  So, Do You Want to Be Facebook Friends? How Social Media Have Changed Plastic Surgery and Medicine Forever , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  Sheila S Nazarian.  Comments on "Advertising on Social Media: The Plastic Surgeon's Prerogative". , 2017, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[19]  Daniel J. Gould,et al.  Emerging trends in social media and plastic surgery. , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[20]  D. Mills,et al.  The marriage of plastic surgery and social media: a relationship to last a lifetime. , 2012, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[21]  Hakim K. Said,et al.  Social media in plastic surgery practices: emerging trends in North America. , 2011, Aesthetic surgery journal.