Automatic quantification of mammary glands on non-contrast x-ray CT by using a novel segmentation approach

This paper describes a brand new automatic segmentation method for quantifying volume and density of mammary gland regions on non-contrast CT images. The proposed method uses two processing steps: (1) breast region localization, and (2) breast region decomposition to accomplish a robust mammary gland segmentation task on CT images. The first step detects two minimum bounding boxes of left and right breast regions, respectively, based on a machine-learning approach that adapts to a large variance of the breast appearances on different age levels. The second step divides the whole breast region in each side into mammary gland, fat tissue, and other regions by using spectral clustering technique that focuses on intra-region similarities of each patient and aims to overcome the image variance caused by different scan-parameters. The whole approach is designed as a simple structure with very minimum number of parameters to gain a superior robustness and computational efficiency for real clinical setting. We applied this approach to a dataset of 300 CT scans, which are sampled with the equal number from 30 to 50 years-old-women. Comparing to human annotations, the proposed approach can measure volume and quantify distributions of the CT numbers of mammary gland regions successfully. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed approach achieves results consistent with manual annotations. Through our proposed framework, an efficient and effective low cost clinical screening scheme may be easily implemented to predict breast cancer risk, especially on those already acquired scans.

[1]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[2]  Xiangrong Zhou,et al.  Automated segmentation of mammary gland regions in non-contrast X-ray CT images , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[3]  Rainer Lienhart,et al.  An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  Song Wang,et al.  Automatic localization of solid organs on 3D CT images by a collaborative majority voting decision based on ensemble learning , 2012, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[5]  Xiangrong Zhou,et al.  Automatic Organ Localization on X-Ray CT Images by Using Ensemble-Learning Techniques , 2012 .

[6]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Breast density: comparison of chest CT with mammography. , 2013, Radiology.

[7]  Xiangrong Zhou,et al.  Automatic anatomy partitioning of the torso region on CT images by using multiple organ localizations with a group-wise calibration technique , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[8]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Performance evaluation of texture measures with classification based on Kullback discrimination of distributions , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Anthony P. Reeves,et al.  Segmentation of the whole breast from low-dose chest CT images , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections. , 2009, Radiology.

[12]  Shuo Li,et al.  Unsupervised Freeview Groupwise Cardiac Segmentation Using Synchronized Spectral Network , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..