Collective uncertainty in partially polarized and partially decohered spin-(1)/(2) systems

It has become common practice to model large spin ensembles as an effective pseudospin with total angular momentum $J=\mathit{Nj}$, where $j$ is the spin per particle. Such approaches (at least implicitly) restrict the quantum state of the ensemble to the so-called symmetric Hilbert space. Here, we argue that symmetric states are not generally well preserved under the type of decoherence typical of experiments involving large clouds of atoms or ions. In particular, symmetric states are rapidly degraded under models of decoherence that act identically but locally on the different members of the ensemble. Using an approach [Phys. Rev. A 78, 052101 (2008)] that is not limited to the symmetric Hilbert space, we explore potential pitfalls in the design and interpretation of experiments on spin-squeezing and collective atomic phenomena when the properties of the symmetric states are extended to systems where they do not apply.

[1]  Ueda,et al.  Squeezed spin states. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[2]  T. Hänsch,et al.  Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms , 2002, Nature.

[3]  J. H. Müller,et al.  Nondestructive probing of Rabi oscillations on the cesium clock transition near the standard quantum limit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[4]  Characterizing the spin state of an atomic ensemble using the magneto-optical resonance method , 2003, quant-ph/0307028.

[5]  Addition or arbitrary number of identical angular momenta , 1977 .

[6]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Moore,et al.  Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[8]  R. Dicke Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes , 1954 .

[9]  A. Parkins,et al.  Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the dissipative Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model with proposed realization in optical cavity QED. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[10]  L. Mandel,et al.  Generation of spin squeezing via continuous quantum nondemolition measurement , 2000, Physical review letters.

[11]  D. Leibfried,et al.  Toward Heisenberg-Limited Spectroscopy with Multiparticle Entangled States , 2004, Science.

[12]  R. Handel,et al.  Deterministic Dicke-state preparation with continuous measurement and control , 2004, quant-ph/0402137.

[13]  N. P. Bigelow,et al.  Atomic quantum non-demolition measurements and squeezing , 1998 .

[14]  H. J. Carmichael,et al.  Higher order corrections to the Dicke superradiant phase transition , 1973 .

[15]  P. Zoller,et al.  Three-dimensional theory for interaction between atomic ensembles and free-space light , 2002 .

[16]  M. Vengalattore,et al.  Spontaneous symmetry breaking in a quenched ferromagnetic spinor Bose–Einstein condensate , 2006, Nature.

[17]  K B Whaley,et al.  Coherence-preserving quantum bits. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[18]  P. Windpassinger,et al.  Mesoscopic atomic entanglement for precision measurements beyond the standard quantum limit , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  B. Julsgaard,et al.  Experimental long-lived entanglement of two macroscopic objects , 2001, Nature.

[20]  V. Vuletić,et al.  On-demand superradiant conversion of atomic spin gratings into single photons with high efficiency. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[21]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  A. Silberfarb,et al.  Quantum control of the hyperfine spin of a Cs atom ensemble. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[23]  Clive Emary,et al.  Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Y. K. Wang,et al.  Phase Transition in the Dicke Model of Superradiance , 1973 .

[25]  Bradley A. Chase,et al.  Collective processes of an ensemble of spin- 1 ∕ 2 particles , 2008, 0805.2911.

[26]  Hideo Mabuchi,et al.  Scattering of polarized laser light by an atomic gas in free space: A quantum stochastic differential equation approach , 2007 .

[27]  Wineland,et al.  Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[28]  A. Sørensen,et al.  Spin squeezing of atomic ensembles via nuclear-electronic spin entanglement. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[29]  T. W. Kornack,et al.  A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer , 2003, Nature.

[30]  Clive Emary,et al.  Quantum chaos triggered by precursors of a quantum phase transition: the dicke model. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[31]  B. M. Fulk MATH , 1992 .

[32]  J. Cirac,et al.  Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Hideo Mabuchi,et al.  Characterizing the entanglement of symmetric many-particle spin-1/2 systems , 2003 .

[34]  A. D. Boozer,et al.  Generation of nonclassical photon pairs for scalable quantum communication with atomic ensembles , 2003, Nature.

[35]  John K. Stockton,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Modelling and feedback control design for quantum state preparation , 2005 .

[36]  L. Mandel,et al.  QUANTUM NONDEMOLITION MEASUREMENTS OF COLLECTIVE ATOMIC SPIN , 1999 .