Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language

BackgroundRecently several studies have shown that people use contextual information to make predictions about the rest of the sentence or story as the text unfolds. Using event related potentials (ERPs) we tested whether these on-line predictions are based on a message-level representation of the discourse or on simple automatic activation by individual words. Subjects heard short stories that were highly constraining for one specific noun, or stories that were not specifically predictive but contained the same prime words as the predictive stories. To test whether listeners make specific predictions critical nouns were preceded by an adjective that was inflected according to, or in contrast with, the gender of the expected noun.ResultsWhen the message of the preceding discourse was predictive, adjectives with an unexpected gender inflection evoked a negative deflection over right-frontal electrodes between 300 and 600 ms. This effect was not present in the prime control context, indicating that the prediction mismatch does not hinge on word-based priming but is based on the actual message of the discourse.ConclusionWhen listening to a constraining discourse people rapidly make very specific predictions about the remainder of the story, as the story unfolds. These predictions are not simply based on word-based automatic activation, but take into account the actual message of the discourse.

[1]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Right and Left Hemisphere Cooperation for Drawing Predictive and Coherence Inferences during Normal Story Comprehension , 2000, Brain and Language.

[3]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[4]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Late Closure in Context , 1998 .

[6]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Diagnosis and Reanalysis: Two Processing Aspects the Brain May Differentiate , 1998 .

[8]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Nicolas Campion,et al.  Predictive Inferences are Represented as Hypothetical Facts. , 2004 .

[11]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[12]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[13]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[14]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Activation and Encoding of Predictive Inferences: The Role of Reading Skill , 2003 .

[15]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[16]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[18]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Reanalysis in sentence processing , 1998 .

[19]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  Encoding differences between bridging and predictive inferences , 1996 .

[21]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  A Unified Model for Predictive and Bridging Inferences , 2002 .

[22]  Jos J. A. Van Berkum,et al.  What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect , 2007, Brain Research.

[23]  M. Castillo,et al.  On-line predictive inferences in reading: Processing timeduring versusafter the priming context , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[24]  M. Kutas,et al.  Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[27]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Van Berkum,et al.  The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: studies in language comprehension and production , 1996 .

[29]  Tracy Linderholm,et al.  Predictive Inference Generation as a Function of Working Memory Capacity and Causal Text Constraints , 2002 .

[30]  Matthew W. Crocker Perspectives on Sentence Processing , 1996 .

[31]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The time course and durability of predictive inferences , 1993 .

[32]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[33]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Expecting Gender: An Event Related Brain Potential Study on the Role of Grammatical Gender in Comprehending a Line Drawing Within a Written Sentence in Spanish , 2003, Cortex.

[34]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  When Does Gender Constrain Parsing? Evidence from ERPs , 1999 .

[35]  Marte Otten,et al.  Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming? , 2008 .

[36]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.