Intracellular responses from cells of the medulla of the fly, Calliphora erythrocephala

Abstract1. Intracellular recordings were made from cells in medullae of immobilized, intact flies Calliphora erythrocephala. Stimuli were moving gratings or small spots projected onto translucent hemispheres before the fly.—2. Responses to stationary flashes included tonic and phasic slow potentials only. Sustaining and On/Off discharges were recorded from cells silent in the dark. Sustaining, dimming, On/Off, +On-Off, and-On/-Off discharges were recorded from cells spontaneous in the dark (Fig. 1, 2, and 3).—3. Some cells were relatively sensitive to 3 log unit changes in flash intensities; others were insensitive (Fig. 4).—4. Receptive fields of a few cells tested were small-field ipsilateral monocular, large-field ipsilateral monocular, or large-field binocular.—5. A number of types of nondirectional cells were found. Some gave stronger discharges to movement than to stationary flashes (Fig. 5).—6. Directionally-selective cells were generally spontaneous. Some simply fired faster in the preferred direction. Others (Fig. 6) had inhibition in the null diriction with or without hyperpolarizations.—7. Possibly-new nondirectional cells were found that were inhibited by changes of direction of movement (Fig. 7)—8. A number of cells were stained with Procion yellow, using high voltage pulses. Double stainings sometimes occurred (Fig. 8).

[1]  Some aspects of visual physiology of the honeybee. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Spurr A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. , 1969, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[3]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the flies Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  N. Strausfeld The optic lobes of Diptera. , 1970, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  F. Zettler,et al.  Active and passive axonal propagation of non-spike signals in the retina ofCalliphora , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[6]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  Extracellular recordings from single neurons in the optic lobe and brain of the locust , 1965 .

[7]  M. Bennett Permeability and Structure of Electrotonic Junctions and Intercellular Movements of Tracers , 1973 .

[8]  K. Kirschfeld,et al.  Lateral Inhibition in the Com pound Eye of the Fly, Musca , 1974, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[9]  R. K. Murphey,et al.  Characterization of an Insect Neuron which cannot be Visualized in situ , 1973 .

[10]  Histological techniques for electron microscopy. Second edition: By Daniel C. Pease, Department of Anatomy, University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California. Academic Press, New York (1964). 381 pp. $9.50 , 1966 .

[11]  Active and Passive Axonal Propagation of Non-Spike Signals in the Retina of Calliphora , 2022 .

[12]  F. Zettler,et al.  Electrophysiological-histological studies on some functional properties of visual cells and second order neurons of an insect retina , 2004, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[13]  S. Ishikawa Visual response patterns of single ganglion cells in the optic lobe of the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori L. , 1962 .

[14]  A. Gorman,et al.  Photoreceptor Potentials of Opposite Polarity in the Eye of the Scallop, Pecten irradians , 1970, The Journal of general physiology.

[15]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[16]  K. Mimura Movement discrimination by the visual system of flies , 1971, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[17]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  The optic lobes of Lepidoptera. , 1970, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  C. Rowell,et al.  A spike-transmitting electrical synapse between visual interneurones in the locust movement detector system , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[19]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Fundamental Properties of Intensity, Form, and Motion Perception in the Visual Nervous Systems of Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica , 1969, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  S. Swihart Single unit activity in the visual pathway of the butterfly Heliconius erato , 1968 .

[21]  D W Arnett,et al.  Spatial and temporal integration properties of units in first optic ganglion of dipterans. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  F. Fitch Histological Techniques for Electron Microscopy , 1961 .

[23]  T. Collett Centripetal and centrifugal visual cells in medulla of the insect optic lobe. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  K. Kirschfeld The visual system of Musca: Studies on optics, structure and function , 1972 .

[25]  S. Laughlin Neural integration in the first optic neuropile of dragonflies , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[26]  S. Laughlin Neural integration in the first optic neuropile of dragonflies , 1973 .

[27]  J. Case,et al.  Differentiation of the effects of pH and CO2 on spiracular function of insects. , 1957, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[28]  J. Dowling,et al.  Neural Organization of the Median Ocellus of the Dragonfly , 1972, The Journal of general physiology.

[29]  H. Eckert,et al.  Intracellular recording and staining of directionally selective motion detecting neurons in fly optic lobe , 1975, Vision Research.

[30]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  Columns and Layers in the Second Synaptic Region of the Fly’s Visual System: The Case for Two Superimposed Neuronal Architectures , 1972 .