Discursive work within weak field mandate events: The case of a conference on assistive technologies for persons with disabilities

Abstract The present study outlines discursive work in a weak field mandate event. The case is a conference focussed on assistive technologies that may help persons with disabilities gain better access to educational and employment spaces in India. Findings highlight three mechanisms which underpinned event-specific discursive work – discursive clarity, alignment, and coordination. In outlining such discursive work, the present study indicates how actors, who congregate as a group without high symbolic or resource support from powerful institutional elites, attempt to influence broader processes of institutionalisation.

[1]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[2]  David M. Boje,et al.  STORIES OF THE STORYTELLING ORGANIZATION: A POSTMODERN ANALYSIS OF DISNEY AS "TAMARA-LAND" , 1995 .

[3]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[4]  C. Grey,et al.  Organized and Disorganized Utopias: An Essay on Presumption , 2002 .

[5]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction , 2002 .

[6]  M. Reiff,et al.  Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy , 2010 .

[7]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[8]  Tammar B. Zilber,et al.  Institutional Multiplicity in Practice: A Tale of Two High-Tech Conferences in Israel , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[9]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[10]  M. Raghavendra.  Paan Singh Tomar, the nation and the sportsperson. , 2012 .

[11]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[12]  Davide Ravasi,et al.  Organizing Thoughts and Connecting Brains: Material Practices and the Transition from Individual to Group-Level Prospective Sensemaking , 2012 .

[13]  V. Hiranandani,et al.  Trapped Between Ableism and Neoliberalism: Critical Reflections on Disability and Employment in India , 2012 .

[14]  M. Kalyanpur.  The Paradox of Majority Underrepresentation in Special Education in India , 2008 .

[15]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[16]  Karen Locke.  Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[17]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[18]  Institutions and Organizations. , 1997 .

[19]  Bill Nichols,et al.  Introduction to documentary , 2001 .

[20]  Kathleen Montgomery,et al.  Using Field-Configuring Events for Sense-Making: A Cognitive Network Approach , 2008 .

[21]  I. Mangham.  Emotional Discourse in Organizations , 1998 .

[22]  Tammar B. Zilber,et al.  Stories and the Discursive Dynamics of Institutional Entrepreneurship: The Case of Israeli High-tech after the Bubble , 2007 .

[23]  Eero Vaara,et al.  A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations , 2008 .

[24]  R. Collins.  On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Rethinking Institutions and Organizations , 2014 .

[26]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  Does Institutional Theory Need Redirecting? , 2014 .

[27]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Understanding Shifting Power Relations within and Across Organizations: A Critical Genre Analysis , 2008 .

[28]  Gerardo Patriotta.  Sensemaking on the Shop Floor: Narratives of Knowledge in Organizations* , 2003 .

[29]  N. Mehrotra.  Disability Rights Movements in India: Politics and Practice , 2011 .

[30]  Joseph Lampel,et al.  Field-Configuring Events as Structuring Mechanisms: How Conferences, Ceremonies, and Trade Shows Constitute New Technologies, Industries, and Marketsguest Editors Introduction , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  Bettina Wittneben,et al.  On melting summits: : the limitations of field-configuring events as catalysts of change in transnational climate policy , 2014 .

[32]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations , 1994 .

[33]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Language and Power , 2009 .

[34]  M. Glynn,et al.  Configuring the Field of Play: How Hosting the Olympic Games Impacts Civic Community , 2008 .

[35]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis in Organizational Studies: Towards an Integrationist Methodology , 2010 .

[36]  J. Mair,et al.  Front-Stage and Backstage Convening: The Transition from Opposition to Mutualistic Coexistence in Organizational Philanthropy , 2014 .

[37]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: the Decline of DDT , 2009 .

[38]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms , 2002 .

[39]  Paul-Brian McInerney.  Showdown at Kykuit: Field-Configuring Events as Loci for Conventionalizing Accounts , 2008 .

[40]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[41]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  DISCOURSE, FIELD-CONFIGURING EVENTS, AND CHANGE IN ORGANIZATIONS AND INSTITUTIONAL FIELDS: NARRATIVES OF DDT AND THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION , 2010 .

[42]  R. Garud.  Conferences as Venues for the Configuration of Emerging Organizational Fields: The Case of Cochlear Implants , 2008 .

[43]  Towards economic participation: examining the impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in India , 2013 .

[44]  Ian Palmer,et al.  Discourse, Organizations and Paradox , 1998 .