Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.

PURPOSE The complicated relationships between mandibular bone components and dental implants have attracted the attention of structural mechanics researchers as well as dental practitioners. Using the finite element method, the present study evaluated various bone and implant parameters for their influence on the distribution of von Mises stresses within the mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS Various parameters were considered, including Young's modulus of cancellous bone, which varies from 1 to 4 GPa, and that of cortical bone, which is between 7 and 20 GPa. Implant length (7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 mm), implant diameter (3.5, 4.0, 4.5, and 5.5 mm), and cortical bone thickness (0.3 to 2.1 mm) were also considered as parameters. Assumptions made in the analysis were: modeling of the complex material and geometric properties of the bone and implant using two-dimensional triangular and quadrilateral plane strain elements, 50% osseointegration between bone and implant, and linear relationships between the stress value and Young's modulus of both cancellous and cortical bone at any specific point. RESULTS An increase in Young's modulus and a decrease in the cortical bone thickness resulted in elevated stresses within both cancellous and cortical bone. Increases in the implant length led to greater surface contact between the bone and implant, thereby reducing the magnitude of stress. CONCLUSIONS The applied masticatory force was demonstrated to be the most influential, in terms of differences between minimum and maximum stress values, versus all other parameters. Therefore loading should be considered of vital importance when planning implant placement.

[1]  H. Iplikçioğlu,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  U C Belser,et al.  Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  J Lindström,et al.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. , 1969, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Atilim Eser,et al.  Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  Georges Tawil,et al.  Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  Niklaus P Lang,et al.  De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  L Sennerby,et al.  Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  Makoto Shiota,et al.  The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  J. Katz,et al.  Finite element analysis of a transmandibular implant. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[10]  S. Robinson,et al.  Stress Distribution in the Single‐Unit Osseointegrated Dental Implant: Finite Element Analyses of Axial and Off‐Axial Loading , 2000, Implant dentistry.

[11]  M. Gallas,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage. , 2005, European journal of orthodontics.

[12]  Andy H. Choi,et al.  Three-dimensional modelling and finite element analysis of the human mandible during clenching. , 2005, Australian dental journal.

[13]  D H DeTolla,et al.  Role of the finite element model in dental implants. , 2000, The Journal of oral implantology.

[14]  F Bosman,et al.  Loading conditions of endosseous implants in an edentulous human mandible: a three-dimensional, finite-element study. , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[15]  Ş. Canay,et al.  Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[16]  Arturo N Natali,et al.  Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  Alexei Mossolov,et al.  Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  Raffaella Aversa,et al.  Mandibular flexure and stress build-up in mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  Michel Barquins,et al.  Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. , 2003, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[20]  B. Johanson,et al.  INTRA-OSSEOUS ANCHORAGE OF DENTAL PROSTHESES , 1970 .

[21]  G. Liu,et al.  Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. , 2004, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[22]  Y C Loo,et al.  Application of finite element method in dental implant research , 2009 .

[23]  H Lai,et al.  Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants. , 1998, The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association.

[24]  L Zhang,et al.  [A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the correlation between lengths and diameters of the implants of fixed bridges with proper stress distribution]. , 2000, Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology.

[25]  M R Rieger,et al.  Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Influences of Mechanical Stress on Prenatal and Postnatal Skeletal Development , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  D. Carter,et al.  Tensile fracture of cancellous bone. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[29]  C E Misch,et al.  Implant design considerations for the posterior regions of the mouth. , 1999, Implant dentistry.

[30]  O. Miyakawa,et al.  Peri-implant stress analysis in simulation models with or without trabecular bone structure. , 2006, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[31]  Joel D Irish A 5,500 year old artificial human tooth from Egypt: a historical note. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[32]  L. Borchers,et al.  Three-dimensional Stress Distribution Around a Dental Implant at Different Stages of Interface Development , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[33]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Supplementum.

[34]  W. Abendschein,et al.  Ultrasonics and selected physical properties of bone. , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  W. Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[36]  W C Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  P. Branemark,et al.  Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses , 1970, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[38]  H. Chun,et al.  Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[39]  A K Patra,et al.  Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants. , 1998, Implant dentistry.

[40]  F. Mante,et al.  Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. , 1998, The Journal of oral implantology.

[41]  D Siegele,et al.  Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[42]  Svatava Konvicková,et al.  Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.