Evaluation and Comparison of the Maxillary Palatal Volume of the Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Cases Treated with and without Presurgical Naso-Alveolar Molding as Compared to the Non-Cleft Children – A 3D DVT Study

BACKGROUND Cleft individuals have a significant altered growth of the craniofacial structures since birth. The treatments available for infants are mostly associated with controversies regarding timing of initiation, types & timing in surgery, grafting etc. Maxilla is affected in all three dimensions; due to surgery alone or in conjugation with the infant orthopaedics, intrinsic growth retardation or combination of all. Considering the current conflict over the use of pre-surgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) and to evaluate the efficacy of PNAM technique, this postdoctoral research was done to compare the maxillary palatal volume in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) cases treated with and without PNAM as compared to non-cleft individuals. METHODS This is an observational cross-sectional study. The palate alveolar volume was assessed and analysed using 3D-DVT angiography machine. RESULTS There was significant difference between cleft group and non-cleft individuals. The cases treated with PNAM had lesser palatal volume. CONCLUSIONS Restrictive effect on maxilla was evident in PNAM cases, but this altered growth could also be an amalgamation of numerous factors like surgery, infant orthopaedics, and intrinsic growth. Therefore, judicious use, current concepts, and biomechanics of PNAM is the need of an hour. KEY WORDS Maxillary Palatal Volume, Unilateral Cleft Cases, Presurgical Naso-Alveolar Molding, 3D-DVT

[1]  R. Thomas,et al.  Assessment of Role of Palatal Dimensions on Speech in Cleft Lip And Palate Patients Treated with And Without Presurgical Orthopaedics. , 2016 .

[2]  B. Thombare,et al.  A New Classification System for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants to assist Presurgical Infant Orthopedics. , 2015, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[3]  S. Shrivastav,et al.  Current status of presurgical infant orthopaedic treatment for cleft lip and palate patients: A critical review , 2014, Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India.

[4]  K. Srilatha,et al.  Pre surgical nasoalveolar molding: changing paradigms in early cleft lip and palate rehabilitation. , 2013, Journal of international oral health : JIOH.

[5]  Vasant Radhakrishnan,et al.  Changes in maxillary alveolar morphology with nasoalveolar molding. , 2010, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[6]  Barry H. Grayson,et al.  Presurgical nasoalveolar moulding treatment in cleft lip and palate patients , 2009, Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India.

[7]  C. Cutting,et al.  Nasoalveolar Molding Improves Long-Term Nasal Symmetry in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip–Cleft Palate Patients , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  R. Takagi,et al.  Relapse Tendency in Maxillary Arch Width in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with Different Maxillary Arch Forms , 2008, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[9]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Infant Orthopedics and Facial Appearance: A Randomized Clinical Trial (Dutchcleft) , 2006, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[10]  E. Ko,et al.  Symmetry of the Nose after Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Preliminary Study , 2005, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  C. Cutting,et al.  Associations between Severity of Clefting and Maxillary Growth in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Treated with Infant Orthopedics , 2001 .

[12]  C. Cutting,et al.  Associations between severity of clefting and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with infant orthopedics. , 2001, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[13]  W. Shaw,et al.  A Six-Center International Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Clefts of the Lip and Palate: Part 1. Principles and Study Design , 1992 .

[14]  W. Shaw,et al.  A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 1. Principles and study design. , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[15]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Sample Size Determination in Health Studies: A Practical Manual , 1991 .

[16]  K. Matsuo,et al.  Nonsurgical Correction of Congenital Auricular Deformities in the Early Neonate: A Preliminary Report , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  Ross Rb The clinical implications of facial growth in cleft lip and palate. , 1970 .

[18]  Mcneil Ck Orthodontic procedures in the treatment of congenital cleft palate. , 1950 .