Continuous selection and self-adaptive evolution strategies

The intention of this work is to eliminate the need for a synchronous generation scheme in the (/spl mu//sup /spl plusmn///spl lambda/) evolution strategy. It is motivated by the need for a more practical implementation of selection strategies on parallel machine architectures. This strategy is known as continuous or steady state selection. Continuous selection is known to reduce significantly the number of function evaluations needed to reach an optimum in evolutionary search. Evolution strategy theory is used to illustrate when continuous selection is more efficient than generational selection. The authors also consider how this gain in efficiency may influence the overall effectiveness of the evolution strategy. The implementation of continuous selection becomes problematic for algorithms using explicitly encoded self-adaptive strategy parameters. Self-adaption is therefore given special consideration. The discussion leads a new evolution strategy version.

[1]  Xin Yao,et al.  Fast Evolution Strategies , 1997, Evolutionary Programming.

[2]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: the covariance matrix adaptation , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[3]  Günter Rudolph,et al.  Contemporary Evolution Strategies , 1995, ECAL.

[4]  Hans-Georg Beyer,et al.  The Theory of Evolution Strategies , 2001, Natural Computing Series.

[5]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Self-Adaptation in Real-Parameter Genetic Algorithms with Simulated Binary Crossover , 1999, GECCO.

[6]  Hans-Georg Beyer,et al.  Local Performance of the (μ/μ, μ)-ES in a Noisy Environment , 2000, FOGA.

[7]  Y. J. Cao,et al.  Evolutionary programming , 1997, Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC '97).

[8]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Evolution and optimum seeking , 1995, Sixth-generation computer technology series.

[9]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  A Spatial Predator-Prey Approach to Multi-objective Optimization: A Preliminary Study , 1998, PPSN.

[10]  Kenneth A. De Jong,et al.  Generation Gaps Revisited , 1992, FOGA.

[11]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Evolution strategies – A comprehensive introduction , 2002, Natural Computing.

[12]  Andreas Zell,et al.  A new Selection Scheme for Steady-State Evolution Strategies , 2000, GECCO.

[13]  Hans-Georg Beyer,et al.  Toward a Theory of Evolution Strategies: Self-Adaptation , 1995, Evolutionary Computation.