A framework to assess the translation of safety pharmacology data to humans.

This article outlines a strategy for collecting accurate data for the determination of the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of safety pharmacology models. This entails performing a retrospective analysis on commonly used safety pharmacology endpoints and an objective assessment of new non-clinical models. Such assessments require a systematic quantitative analysis of safety pharmacology parameters as well as clinical Phase I adverse events. Once the sensitivity, specificity and predictive capacity of models have been determined, they can be aligned within specific phases of the drug discovery and development pipeline for maximal impact, or removed from the screening cascade altogether. Furthermore, data will contribute to evidence-based decision-making based on the knowledge of the model sensitivity and specificity. This strategy should therefore contribute to the reduction of candidate drug attrition and a more appropriate use of animals. More data are needed to increase the power of analysis and enable more accurate comparisons of models e.g. pharmacokinetic/phamacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships as well as non-clinical and clinical outcomes for determining concordance. This task requires the collaboration and agreement of pharmaceutical companies to share data anonymously on proprietary and candidate drugs.

[1]  Derek Leishman,et al.  Towards a drug concentration effect relationship for QT prolongation and torsades de pointes. , 2002, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[2]  T. Kennedy Managing the drug discovery/development interface , 1997 .

[3]  J. Valentin,et al.  A Rabbit Langendorff Heart Proarrhythmia Model: Predictive Value for Clinical Identification of Torsades de Pointes , 2006, British journal of pharmacology.

[4]  P. Willner,et al.  The validity of animal models of depression , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[5]  Jean-Pierre Valentin,et al.  Validation of a larval zebrafish locomotor assay for assessing the seizure liability of early-stage development drugs. , 2008, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[6]  S. Wolfe,et al.  Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  I. Cavero Safety Pharmacology Society: 8th annual meeting , 2009, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[8]  K. Keller,et al.  Toxicological testing handbook : principles, applications, and data interpretation , 2006 .

[9]  W. McKINNEY Models of Mental Disorders: A New Comparative Psychiatry , 1988 .

[10]  A. Camm,et al.  Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development. , 2003, Cardiovascular research.

[11]  K. Hornbuckle,et al.  Evaluation of the Characteristics of Safety Withdrawal of Prescription Drugs from Worldwide Pharmaceutical Markets-1960 to 1999 , 2001 .

[12]  Rob Wallis,et al.  Zebrafish assays as early safety pharmacology screens: paradigm shift or red herring? , 2008, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[13]  A. Hoes,et al.  Anti-HERG activity and the risk of drug-induced arrhythmias and sudden death. , 2005, European heart journal.

[14]  Helen Prior,et al.  Safety pharmacology – a progressive approach , 2002, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology.

[15]  P. Waller,et al.  Stephens' detection of new adverse drug reactions , 2004 .

[16]  A. Breckenridge A clinical pharmacologist's view of drug toxicity. , 2003, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[17]  R. Wallis,et al.  Integrated risk assessment and predictive value to humans of non‐clinical repolarization assays , 2010, British journal of pharmacology.

[18]  Jean-Pierre Valentin,et al.  Safety Pharmacology: Past, Present, and Future , 2006 .

[19]  Jean-Pierre Valentin,et al.  Safety and secondary pharmacology: successes, threats, challenges and opportunities. , 2008, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[20]  M K Pugsley,et al.  Principles of Safety Pharmacology , 2008, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology.

[21]  H. Suganami,et al.  QT PRODACT: sensitivity and specificity of the canine telemetry assay for detecting drug-induced QT interval prolongation. , 2005, Journal of pharmacological sciences.

[22]  P. Corey,et al.  Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients , 2012 .

[23]  T. Igarashi,et al.  Predictability of clinical adverse reactions of drugs by general pharmacology studies. , 1995, The Journal of toxicological sciences.

[24]  Keiji Yamamoto,et al.  QT PRODACT: comparison of non-clinical studies for drug-induced delay in ventricular repolarization and their role in safety evaluation in humans. , 2005, Journal of pharmacological sciences.

[25]  T. Kitayama,et al.  QT PRODACT: in vivo QT assay with a conscious monkey for assessment of the potential for drug-induced QT interval prolongation. , 2005, Journal of pharmacological sciences.

[26]  H. Suganami,et al.  QT PRODACT: inter-facility variability in electrocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters in conscious dogs and monkeys. , 2005, Journal of pharmacological sciences.

[27]  Aldert Piersma,et al.  The ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Embryotoxicity Tests: Results of the Definitive Phase and Evaluation of Prediction Models , 2002, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[28]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  D. Joel Current animal models of obsessive compulsive disorder: A critical review , 2006, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[30]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  Validation of the use of zebrafish larvae in visual safety assessment. , 2008, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[31]  Russel J. Mumper,et al.  The Process of New Drug Discovery and Development, 2nd Edition , 1992 .