Proportion of deaths in hospital in European countries: trends and associations from panel data (2005–2017)

Background: End-of-life care attracts major policy interest. Place of death is an important metric of individual experience and health system performance. Most people prefer to die at home, but hospital is the most common place of death in high-income countries. Little is known about international trends in place of death over time. Methods: We aimed to collate population-level data on place of death in Europe from 2005 to 2017, and to evaluate association with national characteristics and policy choices. We sought data on hospital as the place of death from the 32 European Economic Area countries. We identified national economic, societal, demographic and health system predictors from Eurostat, OECD and the WHO. We analyzed these cross-national panel data using linear regression with panel-corrected standard errors. Results: Our analytic dataset included 30 countries accounting for over 95% of Europe’s population. Average national proportion of deaths occurring in hospital in the study period ranged from 26% to 68%, with a median of 52%. Trends vary markedly by region and wealth, with low and decreasing rate in the North–West, and high and increasing prevalence in the South and East. Controlling for demographic and economic factors, strong palliative care provision and generous government finance of long-term care were associated with fewer hospital deaths. Conclusions: We found modifiable policy choices associated with hospital mortality, as well as wider structural economic and societal factors. Policymakers can act to reduce the proportion of dying in hospital. Background: While school-based health prevention programmes are effective in addressing unhealthy diet and physical inactivity, little is known about their economic implications. We conducted an economic evaluation of the programmes that were previously identified as feasible, acceptable, and sustainable in the Canadian context. Methods: This study builds on a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of feasible, acceptable, and sustainable school- based health promotion programmes. A micro-simulation model incorporated intervention effects on multiple risk factors to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness and return on investment (ROI) of comprehensive school health (CSH), multicomponent, and physical education (PE) curriculum modification programmes. Cost- effectiveness was expressed as the programme costs below which the programme would be cost-effective at a CA$50 000 threshold level. Results: The estimated costs below which interventions were cost-effective per quality- adjusted life year gained were CA$682, CA$444, and CA$416 per student for CSH, multicomponent, and PE curriculum modification programmes, respectively. CSH programmes remained cost-effective per year of chronic disease prevented for costs of up to CA$3384 per student, compared to CA$1911 and CA$1987 for multicompo- nent and PE curriculum modification interventions, respectively. If the interventions were implemented at total discounted intervention costs of CA$100 per student, ROI through the avoidance of direct healthcare costs related to the treatment and management of chronic diseases would be 824% for CSH, 465% for multicomponent interventions, and 484% for PE curriculum modification interventions. Conclusions: Whereas each examined intervention types showed favourable economic benefits, CSH programmes appeared to be the most cost- effective and to have the highest ROI.

[1]  F. Breyer,et al.  The “red herring” after 20 years: ageing and health care expenditures , 2020, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[2]  A. Detsky,et al.  Association Between Palliative Care and Death at Home in Adults With Heart Failure , 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[3]  I. Higginson,et al.  The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions , 2019, The Lancet. Global health.

[4]  I. Higginson,et al.  Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, PLoS medicine.

[5]  Nicolas R. Ziebarth,et al.  End-Of-Life Medical Spending In Last Twelve Months Of Life Is Lower Than Previously Reported. , 2017, Health affairs.

[6]  E. Brenna,et al.  Is caring for older parents detrimental to women’s mental health? The role of the European North–South gradient , 2016 .

[7]  Mariana Mourgova The Impact of Avoidable Mortality on the Life Expectancy in Bulgarian Population , 2016 .

[8]  M. Gott,et al.  Where do people die? An international comparison of the percentage of deaths occurring in hospital and residential aged care settings in 45 populations, using published and available statistics , 2013, International Journal of Public Health.

[9]  D. Haugen,et al.  Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  D. Meier,et al.  Increased access to palliative care and hospice services: opportunities to improve value in health care. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[11]  D. Clark,et al.  Older people's views about home as a place of care at the end of life , 2004, Palliative medicine.

[12]  D. Clark,et al.  Place of death: preferences among cancer patients and their carers. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[13]  C. Centeno,et al.  EAPC Atlas of Palliative Care in Europe 2019 , 2019 .

[14]  Philipp Trein ESPN Thematic Report on Challenges in Long-term Care in Switzerland , 2018 .

[15]  A. Martoni,et al.  [Accessibility of home palliative care and place of death of cancer patients: data analysis of the Emilia-Romagna Region.] , 2018, Recenti progressi in medicina.

[16]  Veselības Stāvoklis Latvijā,et al.  State of Health in the EU , 2017 .

[17]  Pall Med,et al.  Dying in America: improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. , 2015, Military medicine.

[18]  D. Fischbach [Hospital Costs of Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions in Germany]. , 2015, Das Gesundheitswesen.

[19]  Diana Gosálvez Prados The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) , 2010 .

[20]  T. Lynch,et al.  EAPC Atlas of Palliative Care in Europe , 2007 .

[21]  P. J. Edwards,et al.  United Nations Development Programme , 2000 .