An experimental infection (II) to investigate the importance of indirect classical swine fever virus transmission by excretions and secretions of infected weaner pigs.

An experiment was set up to investigate the role of excretions and secretions in the indirect transmission of classical swine fever virus (CSFV). In five small pens, 10 weaner pigs (two pigs per pen) were housed and inoculated with CSFV. Experimental infection was successful in all pigs. The infected pigs were kept in the pens for a period of 15 days after which the pens were depopulated and pigs were killed. At the moment of depopulation, all inoculated pigs were visibly clinically diseased and had high fever. Ten hours later the same pens were repopulated with five pairs of susceptible pigs. From inoculation onwards and especially between depopulation and restocking, the pens were neither cleaned nor disinfected. Four days post-repopulation, three of the susceptible pigs were detected positive on virus isolation. A fourth pig was detected positive 2 days later. Later on, the remaining pigs also became infected, most probably due to contact and between pen infections. It can be concluded that transmission of the virus via excretions and secretions succeeded in four of 10 pigs. This result indicates that transmission of CSFV via excretions and secretions can be of importance in a late, clinical stage of disease.

[1]  V. Moennig,et al.  Clinical signs and epidemiology of classical swine fever: a review of new knowledge. , 2003, Veterinary journal.

[2]  A. de Kruif,et al.  An experimental infection to investigate the indirect transmission of classical swine fever virus by excretions of infected pigs. , 2002, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[3]  M C M de Jong,et al.  Rate of inter-herd transmission of classical swine fever virus by different types of contact during the 1997–8 epidemic in The Netherlands , 2002, Epidemiology and Infection.

[4]  A. Kruif,et al.  An Experimental Infection With Classical Swine Fever Virus in Pregnant Sows: Transmission of the Virus, Course of the Disease, Antibody Response and Effect on Gestation , 2001 .

[5]  J. Stegeman,et al.  Factors associated with the introduction of classical swine fever virus into pig herds in the central area of the 1997/98 epidemic in the Netherlands , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[6]  A. de Kruif,et al.  Airborne transmission of classical swine fever virus under experimental conditions , 2000, Veterinary Record.

[7]  T. Stadejek,et al.  Classical swine fever virus: a ring test to evaluate RT-PCR detection methods. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[8]  S. Edwards Survival and inactivation of classical swine fever virus. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[9]  A. Elbers,et al.  The 1997-1998 epidemic of classical swine fever in the Netherlands. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[10]  V. Moennig,et al.  Introduction to classical swine fever: virus, disease and control policy. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[11]  J A Smak,et al.  The classical swine fever epidemic 1997-1998 in The Netherlands: descriptive epidemiology. , 1999, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[12]  A. Bouma,et al.  Transmission of classical swine fever virus by artificial insemination. , 1999, Veterinary microbiology.

[13]  A de Kruif,et al.  An experimental infection with classical swine fever virus in weaner pigs. I. Transmission of the virus, course of the disease, and antibody response. , 1998, The Veterinary quarterly.

[14]  G. E. Jones,et al.  A crude cytotoxin vaccine protects sheep against experimental Pasteurella haemolytica serotype A2 infection. , 1989, Veterinary microbiology.

[15]  C. Terpstra,et al.  Epizootiology of Hog Cholera , 1988 .

[16]  J. Harkness Classical swine fever and its diagnosis: a current view , 1985, Veterinary Record.

[17]  Jensen Mh Detection of antibodies against hog cholera virus and bovine viral diarrhea virus in porcine serum. A comparative examination using CF, PLA and NPLA assays. , 1981 .

[18]  J. V. van Bekkum,et al.  Virus excretion in vaccinated pigs subject to contact infection with virulent hog cholera strains. , 2010, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B.

[19]  R. W. Hughes,et al.  Some factors that may influence hog cholera transmission. , 1960, American journal of veterinary research.