Estimation of an IRT Model by Mplus for Dichotomously Scored Responses Under Different Estimation Methods

The purpose of this article is twofold. The first is to provide evaluative information on the recovery of model parameters and their standard errors for the two-parameter item response theory (IRT) model using different estimation methods by Mplus. The second is to provide easily accessible information for practitioners, instructors, and students about the relationships between IRT and item factor analysis (FA) parameterizations. Specifically, this is done using the “Theta” and “Delta” parameterizations in Mplus for unidimensional and multidimensional modeling with dichotomous and polytomous responses with and without the scaling constant D. The first objective aims at investigating differences that may occur when using different estimation methods in Mplus for binary response modeling. The second objective was motivated by practical interest observed among graduate students and applied researchers. The relations between IRT and Mplus FA “Theta” and “Delta” parameterizations are described using expressions without the use of matrices, which can be understood efficiently by applied researchers and students.

[1]  R. D. Bock,et al.  Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters , 1982 .

[2]  Akihito Kamata,et al.  A Note on the Relation Between Factor Analytic and Item Response Theory Models , 2008 .

[3]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .

[4]  Alberto Maydeu-Olivares,et al.  Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[5]  Christine E. DeMars,et al.  Item Response Theory , 2010, Assessing Measurement Invariance for Applied Research.

[6]  F. Samejima Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores , 1968 .

[7]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  IRT in Mplus , 2016 .

[8]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[9]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables , 1987 .

[10]  R. D. Bock,et al.  Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm , 1981 .

[11]  K. Petrides Introduction to Psychometric Theory , 2011 .

[12]  B. Muthén,et al.  Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study , 2007 .

[13]  Tihomir Asparouhov,et al.  Item response mixture modeling: application to tobacco dependence criteria. , 2006, Addictive behaviors.

[14]  Mark Reiser,et al.  Validity of the chi‐square test in dichotomous variable factor analysis when expected frequencies are small , 1994 .

[15]  Frank B. Baker,et al.  Item Response Theory : Parameter Estimation Techniques, Second Edition , 2004 .