Weak ties and contact initiation in everyday life: Exploring contextual variations from contact diaries

Abstract This study examines how the significance of weak ties varies by contact initiation and purposes of contact in everyday life. Based on data from 55 contact diaries, we analyze the extent to which diary keepers judge each of 104,361 specific contacts as beneficial after they occur, by how well they knew the target person beforehand. Our hypothesis testing and bootstrap resampling show that when a diary keeper initiates a contact, weak ties result in more gains. In contrast, when the other party starts the contact, it is strong rather than weak ties that turn out to be more beneficial to the diary keeper. Such effects vary by other contextual factors, however, particularly the purposes of contacts.

[1]  James A. Palmore,et al.  The Chicago snowball : a study of the flow and diffusion of family planning information , 1967 .

[2]  Henk Flap,et al.  Position Generator measures and their relationship to other Social Capital measures , 2008 .

[3]  J. Clyde Mitchell,et al.  The components of strong ties among homeless women , 1987 .

[4]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[5]  Yang-chih Fu.  Position Generator and Actual Networks in Everyday Life: An Evaluation with Contact Diary , 2008 .

[6]  Henk Flap,et al.  Creation and Returns of Social Capital. A new Research Program , 1999, The Tocqueville Review.

[7]  S. Resnick.  A Probability Path , 1999 .

[8]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[9]  Yang-chih Fu,et al.  Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: a single-item survey question and the contact diary , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[10]  Rafael Wittek,et al.  Structural Holes , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  HOMOPHILY-HETEROPHILY: RELATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1970 .

[13]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital , 2001 .

[14]  T. Ball,et al.  Political innovation and conceptual change , 1990 .

[15]  Nan Lin,et al.  Access to occupations through social ties , 1986 .

[16]  Markus Baer.  The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  최현.  CITIZENSHIP: , 2006, Liberalism Beyond Justice.

[18]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[19]  Alain Degenne.  Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[20]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Toward National Well-Being Accounts , 2004 .

[21]  Jan W. van Deth,et al.  Citizenship and involvement in European Democracies : A Comparative Analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Social Networks , 2013, Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization.

[23]  M. Forsé,et al.  Role and rise of social capital , 2004 .

[24]  M. Gurevitch,et al.  The social structure of acquaintanceship networks , 1961 .

[25]  Douglas S. Massey,et al.  Continuities in Transnational Migration: An Analysis of Nineteen Mexican Communities , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Christopher Steven Marcum,et al.  Unanticipated Gains: The Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life , 2010 .

[27]  George C. Homans,et al.  Social behavior: Its elementary forms, Revised ed. , 1974 .

[28]  Y. Bian.  Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China , 1997 .

[29]  Vilna Francine,et al.  Survival of the Knitted: Immigrant Social Networks in a Stratified World , 2007 .

[30]  Bas Denters,et al.  Norms of good citizenship , 2007 .

[31]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[32]  Sigrid Roßteutscher,et al.  Small-scale democracy: citizen power in the domains of everyday life , 2007 .

[33]  K. Campbell,et al.  Name generators in surveys of personal networks , 1991 .

[34]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  The Resource Generator: social capital quantification with concrete items , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[35]  David B. Tindall,et al.  Gender, Network Capital, Social Capital, and Political Capital: The Consequences of Personal Network Diversity for Environmentalists in British Columbia1 , 2008 .

[36]  Bob Edwards,et al.  Social Capital: An International Research Program , 2010 .

[37]  William S. Harvey,et al.  Strong or Weak Ties? British and Indian Expatriate Scientists Finding Jobs in Boston , 2008 .

[38]  B. Efron.  The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[39]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[40]  Markku Lonkila,et al.  Social Networks in Post-Soviet Russia. Continuity and Change in the Everyday Life of St. Petersburg Teachers , 1999 .

[41]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[42]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[43]  B. Wegener,et al.  Job Mobility and Social Ties: Social Resources, Prior Job, and Status Attainment , 1991 .

[44]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[45]  Dan Ao,et al.  Networks of Opportunity: Gender, Race, and Job Leads , 2009 .

[46]  N. Lin.  Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[47]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  M. Kochen,et al.  Contacts and influence , 1978 .

[49]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method , 2004, Science.

[50]  Glenn J. Stalker,et al.  Measuring Diversity in Daily Social Contact: The Contribution of Social Context, Work and Leisure on the Opportunity for Engagement , 2008 .

[51]  Yang-chih Fu,et al.  Contact Diaries , 2007 .