Endotoxin Contamination in Nanomaterials Leads to the Misinterpretation of Immunosafety Results

Given the presence of engineered nanomaterials in consumers’ products and their application in nanomedicine, nanosafety assessment is becoming increasingly important. In particular, immunosafety aspects are being actively investigated. In nanomaterial immunosafety testing strategies, it is important to consider that nanomaterials and nanoparticles are very easy to become contaminated with endotoxin, which is a widespread contaminant coming from the Gram-negative bacterial cell membrane. Because of the potent inflammatory activity of endotoxin, contaminated nanomaterials can show inflammatory/toxic effects due to endotoxin, which may mask or misidentify the real biological effects (or lack thereof) of nanomaterials. Therefore, before running immunosafety assays, either in vitro or in vivo, the presence of endotoxin in nanomaterials must be evaluated. This calls for using appropriate assays with proper controls, because many nanomaterials interfere at various levels with the commercially available endotoxin detection methods. This also underlines the need to develop robust and bespoke strategies for endotoxin evaluation in nanomaterials.

[1]  Tim Sandle A Comparative Study of Different Methods for Endotoxin Destruction , 2013 .

[2]  Ragnar Rylander,et al.  Review: Endotoxin in the environment — exposure and effects , 2002 .

[3]  Albert Duschl,et al.  Problems and challenges in the development and validation of human cell-based assays to determine nanoparticle-induced immunomodulatory effects , 2011, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[4]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Detection of Endotoxin Contamination of Graphene Based Materials Using the TNF-α Expression Test and Guidelines for Endotoxin-Free Graphene Oxide Production , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  The complex cascade of cellular events governing inflammasome activation and IL-1β processing in response to inhaled particles , 2015, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[6]  Jian Qin,et al.  The importance of an endotoxin-free environment during the production of nanoparticles used in medical applications. , 2006, Nano letters.

[7]  A. Kraegeloh,et al.  Interference of silica nanoparticles with the traditional Limulus amebocyte lysate gel clot assay , 2014, Innate immunity.

[8]  G Sullivan,et al.  Variations on a Common Theme? , 2001, Journal of homosexuality.

[9]  Peter Wick,et al.  Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods , 2012, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[10]  Marina A Dobrovolskaia,et al.  Ambiguities in applying traditional Limulus amebocyte lysate tests to quantify endotoxin in nanoparticle formulations. , 2010, Nanomedicine.

[11]  A. Liu Endotoxin exposure in allergy and asthma: reconciling a paradox. , 2002, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[12]  W. Yeh,et al.  LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. , 2008, Cytokine.

[13]  Yang Li,et al.  Endotoxin contamination: a key element in the interpretation of nanosafety studies. , 2016, Nanomedicine.

[14]  Marina A Dobrovolskaia,et al.  Choice of method for endotoxin detection depends on nanoformulation. , 2014, Nanomedicine.

[15]  Clinton F Jones,et al.  In vitro assessments of nanomaterial toxicity. , 2009, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[16]  E. Madarász,et al.  Uptake and bio-reactivity of polystyrene nanoparticles is affected by surface modifications, ageing and LPS adsorption: in vitro studies on neural tissue cells. , 2015, Nanoscale.

[17]  Ragnar Rylander,et al.  Endotoxin in the environment--exposure and effects. , 2002, Journal of endotoxin research.

[18]  Manmohan J. Singh,et al.  Endotoxin limits in formulations for preclinical research. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[19]  M. Hiles Guideline on Validation of the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate , 1987 .

[20]  U. Kodavanti,et al.  Manufactured and airborne nanoparticle cardiopulmonary interactions: a review of mechanisms and the possible contribution of mast cells , 2012, Inhalation toxicology.

[21]  Yuliang Zhao,et al.  Polyhydroxylated metallofullerenols stimulate IL-1β secretion of macrophage through TLRs/MyD88/NF-κB pathway and NLRP₃ inflammasome activation. , 2014, Small.

[22]  Yu-Chen Hu,et al.  Simultaneous induction of autophagy and toll-like receptor signaling pathways by graphene oxide. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[23]  Seamus J. Martin,et al.  Proteolytic Processing of Interleukin-1 Family Cytokines: Variations on a Common Theme. , 2015, Immunity.

[24]  Ying Liu,et al.  The triggering of apoptosis in macrophages by pristine graphene through the MAPK and TGF-beta signaling pathways. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[25]  M. Sakata,et al.  Chromatographic removal of endotoxin from protein solutions by polymer particles. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[26]  C. Murphy,et al.  Interactions of Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides with Gold Nanorod Surfaces Investigated by Refractometric Sensing. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[27]  Lorian,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO ENDOTOXIN AND ITS RELATION TO ASTHMA IN SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN , 2022 .

[28]  Lei Wang,et al.  Graphene oxide induces toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-dependent necrosis in macrophages. , 2013, ACS nano.

[29]  B. Gilbert The uninvited guest. , 1966, Midwife and health visitor.

[30]  T. A. Hatton,et al.  Binding of functionalized paramagnetic nanoparticles to bacterial lipopolysaccharides and DNA. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[31]  Diana Boraschi,et al.  Optimising the use of commercial LAL assays for the analysis of endotoxin contamination in metal colloids and metal oxide nanoparticles , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[32]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Nanosafety in Europe 2015-2020: Towards Safe and Sustainable Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Innovations , 2013 .

[33]  N. Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  Mechanisms of cell uptake, inflammatory potential and protein corona effects with gold nanoparticles. , 2016, Nanomedicine.

[34]  Michael V Sefton,et al.  Endotoxin: the uninvited guest. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[35]  T. Groth,et al.  Functionalized nanoparticles for endotoxin binding in aqueous solutions. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[36]  Neus G Bastús,et al.  Peptides conjugated to gold nanoparticles induce macrophage activation. , 2009, Molecular immunology.

[37]  Dirk Valkenborg,et al.  Assessing the Immunosafety of Engineered Nanoparticles with a Novel in Vitro Model Based on Human Primary Monocytes. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[38]  Helinor J Johnston,et al.  A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: Particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[39]  J. Molina-Bolívar,et al.  Interaction of bacterial endotoxine (lipopolysaccharide) with latex particles: application to latex agglutination immunoassays. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[40]  Luis M Liz-Marzán,et al.  Sterilization matters: consequences of different sterilization techniques on gold nanoparticles. , 2010, Small.

[41]  C. Janeway,et al.  Innate immune recognition. , 2002, Annual review of immunology.

[42]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[43]  R. Brooks,et al.  Endotoxin contamination of particles produces misleading inflammatory cytokine responses from macrophages in vitro. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[44]  R. Danner,et al.  Endotoxemia in human septic shock. , 1991, Chest.