Prediction rule for characterization of hepatic lesions revealed on MR imaging: estimation of malignancy.

OBJECTIVE Our aims were to establish factors that are most predictive of hepatic lesion malignancy and to formulate a prediction rule. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study of 227 abdominal MR imaging examinations revealed 85 lesions in 67 patients (29 men, 38 women; age range, 29-78 years; mean age, 51.4 years) who were being examined for primary malignancy (n = 42) or unknown lesion characterization (n = 25). All were referred for MR imaging after CT or sonography. Patient demographics (age, sex, history of malignancy), lesion size and morphology, quantitative T2 calculation, and pattern of enhancement on gadopentetate dimeglumine administration were evaluated for predictive ability. RESULTS Thirty-two liver lesions were malignant (eight colon cancer, five breast cancer, four cervical cancer, three renal cancer, three lung cancer, and nine miscellaneous cancers), 53 were benign (37 hemangiomas, 15 cysts, and one focal nodular hyperplasia). Calculated T2 relaxation times (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) were as follows: malignant tumors (91.72 +/- 21.9 msec), hemangiomas (136.1 +/- 26.3 msec), cysts (284.1 +/- 38.2 msec) (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that lesion size and sex and age of patient were not significant independent predictors (p > 0.05). However, the combination of a history of malignancy, T2 value, and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhancement pattern allowed generation of a prediction rule with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95. The patient's weight, lesion morphology, and cell type of the primary malignancy did not provide additional predictive information (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION We recommend using the combination of T2 quantification and patient history of malignancy before deciding to administer gadopentetate dimeglumine for optimal lesion characterization, especially for equivocal lesions with T2 values between 90 and 130 msec. These factors allowed the construction of a prediction rule for lesion characterization.

[1]  P R Mueller,et al.  Focal liver lesions: characterization with conventional spin-echo versus fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[2]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Hepatic tumors: differentiation by transverse relaxation time (T2) of magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Radiology.

[3]  J J Brown,et al.  Characterization of focal hepatic masses by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: findings in 311 lesions. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[5]  S. Mirowitz,et al.  T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen: fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo sequences. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  D G Mitchell,et al.  Hepatic lesions: discrimination of nonsolid, benign lesions from solid, malignant lesions with heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[7]  J C Gore,et al.  Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple‐echo MRI techniques. I. Effects of radiofrequency pulse imperfections , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Single-shot T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper abdomen: preliminary experience with double-echo HASTE technique. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  MR differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from cavernous hemangioma: complementary roles of FLASH and T2 values. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Cohen,et al.  Value of T1 and T2 relaxation times from echoplanar MR imaging in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Abdominal MR imaging: evaluation of a fast spin-echo sequence. , 1994, Radiology.

[12]  W. Meyers,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas vs metastases: MR differentiation at 1.5 T. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  J. Heiken,et al.  Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: assessment of MR tissue specificity with a simplified T2 index. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  J H Wasson,et al.  Clinical Prediction Rules: Have They Come of Age? , 1996 .

[15]  Introduction to clinical prediction rules for radiologists. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas and malignant tumors: improved differentiation with heavily T2-weighted conventional spin-echo MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[17]  Jean-Luc Daire,et al.  Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. , 2003, Radiology.

[18]  E. Yucel,et al.  Signal characteristics of focal liver lesions on double echo T2-weighted conventional spin echo MRI: observer performance versus quantitative measurements of T2 relaxation times. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Distinction of hepatic cavernous hemangioma from hepatic metastases with MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[20]  S. F. Quinn,et al.  Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: simple diagnostic sign with dynamic bolus CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[21]  J. Wittenberg,et al.  Hepatic tumors: quantitative tissue characterization with MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[22]  D. Marks,et al.  Differentiation of focal intrahepatic lesions with 99mTc-red blood cell imaging. , 1983, Radiology.

[23]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of cavernous hemangioma of the liver: tissue-specific characterization. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  D G Mitchell,et al.  Fast MR imaging techniques: Impact in the abdomen , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  M S Roos,et al.  Effects of slice selection and diffusion on T2 measurement , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  M. Cohen,et al.  Echoplanar MR imaging of the liver in patients with focal hepatic lesions: quantitative analysis of images made with various pulse sequences. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[28]  J. Gore,et al.  Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple‐echo MRI techniques. II. Effects of static field inhomogeneity , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  B Hamm,et al.  Differentiation of hepatic hemangiomas from metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.