Portable Electronic Devices as Memory and Organizational Aids After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Consumer Survey Study

ObjectiveTo ascertain consumer experiences and attitudes regarding the use of portable electronic devices as memory and organizational aids after traumatic brain injury (TBI). DesignSurvey study. SettingPost-acute TBI rehabilitation programs, research registries. ParticipantsEighty persons with moderate to severe TBI interviewed a median of 3.7 years postinjury. Outcome MeasureSurvey administered in structured interview format, analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. ResultsTwo thirds of participants reported regular use of computers, but fewer than one third had experience with handheld computers or similar devices. Interest in using portable devices for everyday memory and organizational tasks was higher than the expressed need for improvement in participants' current strategies. Respondents expressed reliable preferences for key device features, including simplicity of use, technical support, and long-lasting battery power. Preferred functions included keeping track of money spent, remembering things to do, and remembering what other people say. ConclusionPortable electronic devices are acceptable or desirable by consumers with moderate to severe TBI for use as compensatory aids.

[1]  Barbara A Wilson,et al.  Preliminary report of a NeuroPage service within a health care system. , 2003, NeuroRehabilitation.

[2]  M. Scherer,et al.  Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process , 2002 .

[3]  Steven E. Stock,et al.  Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a Palmtop personal computer. , 2002, Mental retardation.

[4]  H. Emslie,et al.  Enhancing an appointment diary on a pocket computer for use by people after brain injury , 2001, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[5]  G. Frisoni,et al.  An electronic memory aid to support prospective memory in patients in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease: A pilot study , 2003, Aging & mental health.

[6]  J. Whyte,et al.  Use of a Portable Voice Organizer to Remember Therapy Goals in Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Within-Subjects Trial , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[7]  H. Emslie,et al.  Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. , 2001, Brain injury.

[8]  H. Kaye,et al.  Computer and Internet Use among People with Disabilities. Disability Statistics Report 13. , 2000 .

[9]  Klaus Abraham-Fuchs,et al.  Telerehabilitation Needs: A Survey of Persons with Acquired Brain Injury , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[10]  Tessa Hart,et al.  Clinician expectations for portable electronic devices as cognitive-behavioural orthoses in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation , 2003, Brain injury.

[11]  A. Baddeley,et al.  How Do Old Dogs Learn New Tricks: Teaching a Technological Skill to Brain Injured People , 1989, Cortex.

[12]  J. Whyte,et al.  Awareness of behavioral, cognitive, and physical deficits in acute traumatic brain injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Evans,et al.  Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  Jonathan J. Evans,et al.  Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[15]  N. A. Hersh,et al.  NeuroPage: The Rehabilitation of Memory Dysfunction by Prosthetic Memory and Cueing. , 1994, NeuroRehabilitation.

[16]  M. D. van den Broek,et al.  Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. , 2000, Brain injury.