Persistence of policy shocks to Ecological Footprint of the USA

Abstract This is the first study that aims to investigate policy shocks to Ecological Footprint of the USA. More precisely, we analyze the stochastic behaviors of the Ecological Footprint and its components (carbon Footprint, cropland, grazing land, forest products, built-up-land, and fishing grounds) by using Fourier unit root tests that are more powerful under an unknown number of breaks. The stationarity of a time series gives information about its future behavior based on past behavior. More specifically, stationarity properties give information on whether shocks have transitory or permanent effects on a variable; therefore, the stationarity of a time series has important implications to the formation of appropriate policies by decision makers. Stochastic properties of the Ecological Footprint are important considerations to the implementation of global and local policies targeting global warming, climate change and environmental degradation. Empirical results show that the Ecological Footprint is non-stationary which suggests that policies affecting the Ecological Footprint will have long-term and permanent effects. Findings and policy implications are further discussed.

[1]  A. Pereira,et al.  Do global CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel consumption exhibit long memory? a fractional-integration analysis , 2017 .

[2]  John A. List,et al.  Have air pollutant emissions converged among U.S. regions? Evidence from unit root tests , 1999 .

[3]  Diego Romero-Ávila,et al.  Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions among industrialised countries revisited , 2008 .

[4]  John A. List,et al.  Are CO2 Emission Levels Converging Among Industrial Countries? , 2003 .

[5]  Theodore Panagiotidis,et al.  On the stationarity of per capita carbon dioxide emissions over a century , 2013 .

[6]  P. F. González,et al.  Stochastic convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. An approach from nonlinear stationarity analysis , 2015, 2402.00567.

[7]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  LM Tests for a Unit Root in the Presence of Deterministic Trends , 1992 .

[8]  Chien-Chiang Lee,et al.  Income and CO2 emissions: Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests , 2009 .

[9]  Donggyu Sul,et al.  Transition Modeling and Econometric Convergence Tests , 2007 .

[10]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[11]  William E. Rees,et al.  Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out , 1992 .

[12]  Huiming Zhu,et al.  Are shocks to nuclear energy consumption per capita permanent or temporary? A global perspective , 2016 .

[13]  Jill L. Caviglia-Harris,et al.  Taking the "U" out of Kuznets: a comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. , 2009 .

[14]  Christine Amsler,et al.  An LM Test for a Unit Root in the Presence of a Structural Change , 1995, Econometric Theory.

[15]  D. Chambers,et al.  Natural Resources and Economic Growth: Some Theory and Evidence , 2009 .

[16]  Joakim Westerlund,et al.  Testing for Convergence in Carbon Dioxide Emissions Using a Century of Panel Data , 2008 .

[17]  Joseph E. Aldy,et al.  Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Convergence or Divergence? , 2005 .

[18]  C. Nelson,et al.  Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series: Some evidence and implications , 1982 .

[19]  W. Enders,et al.  A Unit Root Test Using a Fourier Series to Approximate Smooth Breaks , 2012 .

[20]  R. Elliott,et al.  Stochastic Divergence or Convergence of Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Re-examining the Evidence , 2008 .

[21]  B. Saboori,et al.  Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Answers to common questions in Ecological Footprint accounting , 2009 .

[23]  Cagin Karul,et al.  A panel stationarity test with gradual structural shifts: Re-investigate the international commodity price shocks , 2017 .

[24]  Robin L. Lumsdaine,et al.  Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit-Root Hypothesis , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[25]  Vinod Mishra,et al.  Are fluctuations in energy consumption per capita transitory? Evidence from a panel of Pacific Island countries , 2009 .

[26]  Giangiacomo Bravo,et al.  A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator , 2008 .

[27]  Ecological Footprint and Endogenous Economic Growth in the Poyang Lake Area in China Based on Empirical Analysis of Panel Data Model , 2012 .

[28]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[29]  Ruxandra Prodan Potential Pitfalls in Determining Multiple Structural Changes With an Application to Purchasing Power Parity , 2004 .

[30]  Matti Liski,et al.  Trends and Breaks in per-capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions , 1870-2028 , 2003 .

[31]  Gene Bazan Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[32]  Mark C. Strazicich,et al.  Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[33]  G. Grossman,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .

[34]  P. Perron,et al.  Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power , 2001 .

[35]  Xiaoqing Wu,et al.  Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: A spatial econometric approach , 2013 .

[36]  D. Andrews,et al.  Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis , 1992 .

[37]  P. Perron,et al.  The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock And The Unit Root Hypothesis , 1989 .

[38]  P. Phillips Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression , 1988 .

[39]  W. Fuller,et al.  LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTICS FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME SERIES WITH A UNIT ROOT , 1981 .

[40]  Chun-Ping Chang,et al.  New evidence on the convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions from panel seemingly unrelated regressions augmented Dickey–Fuller tests , 2008 .

[41]  Khalid Malik,et al.  Human Development Report 2014: Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience , 2014 .

[42]  J. Stock,et al.  Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root , 1992 .

[43]  A. Neumann,et al.  Stationarity changes in long-run energy commodity prices , 2016 .

[44]  Olivier Darné,et al.  Environmental Kuznets Curve and Ecological Footprint: A Time Series Analysis , 2013 .

[45]  S. Bibi,et al.  Convergence of per capita CO2 emissions across the globe: Insights via wavelet analysis , 2017 .

[46]  W. Enders,et al.  The flexible Fourier form and Dickey–Fuller type unit root tests , 2012 .

[47]  Joseph E. Aldy,et al.  Divergence in State-Level Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions , 2006, Land Economics.

[48]  I. Ozturk,et al.  A new approach to energy consumption per capita stationarity: Evidence from OECD countries , 2016 .

[49]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework , 2013 .

[50]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Renewable-to-total electricity consumption ratio: Estimating the permanent or transitory fluctuations based on flexible Fourier stationarity and unit root tests , 2016 .

[51]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Testing the stationarity of CO2 emissions series in Sub-Saharan African countries by incorporating nonlinearity and smooth breaks , 2016 .

[52]  Phu Nguyen Van Distribution Dynamics of CO2 Emissions , 2005 .

[53]  T. Jobert,et al.  Convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions in the EU: Legend or reality? , 2010 .

[54]  Mübariz Hasanov,et al.  A re-examination of stationarity of energy consumption: Evidence from new unit root tests , 2011 .

[55]  Are shocks to electricity consumption transitory or permanent? Sub-national evidence from Turkey , 2016 .

[56]  M. Wackernagel Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity : a tool for planning toward sustainability , 1994 .

[57]  P. Narayan,et al.  Applied econometrics and implications for energy economics research , 2015 .

[58]  Robert Taylor,et al.  The Flexible Fourier Form and Local Generalised Least Squares De‐Trended Unit Root Tests , 2012 .

[59]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Global convergence in per capita CO2 emissions , 2013 .

[60]  A. Mohammed,et al.  Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation , 2015 .

[61]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[62]  Roberto Ezcurra,et al.  Is there cross-country convergence in carbon dioxide emissions? , 2007 .

[63]  P. Bartelmus Quantitative Eco-nomics: How sustainable are our economies? , 2008 .

[64]  Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo,et al.  Is the environmental performance of industrialized countries converging? A ‘SURE’ approach to testing for convergence , 2008 .

[65]  Anne Marie Todd,et al.  Climate Change Education and the Ecological Footprint , 2008 .

[66]  Pierre Perron,et al.  Dealing with Structural Breaks , 2005 .

[67]  W. Enders,et al.  A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks , 2006 .

[68]  Robert Costanza,et al.  The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept , 2000 .