How to achieve the huggable behavior of the social robot Probo?: a reflection on the actuators

Most robots have a mechanical look or are covered with plastic or metallic shells. Their actuators are stiff which gives them not only an unnatural look, but also an unnatural touch. The goal of the huggable robot Probo is to serve as robotic research platform for human–robot interaction (HRI) studies with a special focus on children. Since not only cognitive interaction, but also physical interaction is targeted a new mechatronic design must be developed. To give Probo a huggable and safe behavior a new set of actuators is developed together with a triple layered protection cover which is presented in this paper. Probo’s soft touch is introduced, on the one side by use of novel passive compliant actuators, Compliant Bowden Cable Driven Actuators (CBCDAs), and on the other side by combining custom made servo motors, Non Back Drivable Servos (NBDSs), with flexible components and materials such as springs, silicon and foam. The working principle of the novel CBCDA is extensively described, together with experiments in order to determine its level of compliance and its bandwidth.

[1]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in a biped robot , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  D. Herring,et al.  Adjustable Robotic Tendon using a ‘ Jack Spring ’ TM , 2005 .

[3]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Affective Touch for Robotic Companions , 2005, ACII.

[4]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition , 2008, PerMIS.

[5]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[6]  R. Ham,et al.  Compliant actuator designs , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  Kyu-Jin Cho,et al.  Segmented shape memory alloy actuators using hysteresis loop control , 2006 .

[8]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Analysis of factors that bring mental effects to elderly people in robot assisted activity , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[10]  Kikuo Fujimura,et al.  The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  日本ロボット学会 IROS '95 : proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems : human robot interaction and cooperative robots, August 5-9, 1995, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA , 1995 .

[12]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  MIT-Media Lab , 1991, ICMC.

[13]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Title of paper : KASPAR – A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research , 2009 .

[14]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Robovie-IV: A Communication Robot Interacting with People Daily in an Office , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Proxy-based Sliding Mode Control of a Planar Pneumatic Manipulator , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Matthew J. Hertenstein,et al.  The Communicative Functions of Touch in Humans, Nonhuman Primates, and Rats: A Review and Synthesis of the Empirical Research , 2006, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[17]  K.W. Hollander,et al.  Adjustable robotic tendon using a 'Jack Spring'/spl trade/ , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[18]  Ja Choon Koo,et al.  A solid state actuator based on the PEDOT/NBR system , 2006 .

[19]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[20]  Ian W. Hunter,et al.  A comparative analysis of actuator technologies for robotics , 1992 .

[21]  Hideki Kozima Infanoid: An Experimental Tool for Developmental Psycho-Robotics , 2000 .

[22]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  Behavior selection and motion modulation in emotionally grounded architecture for QRIO SDR-4XII , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[23]  L. Cañamero,et al.  How Does It Feel? Emotional Interaction with a Humanoid LEGO Robot , 2002 .

[24]  P. Fishbane,et al.  Physics for scientists and engineers : with modern physics , 2005 .

[25]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Affect and Proto-Affect in Effective Functioning , 2005, Who Needs Emotions?.

[26]  A. Rogier [Communication without words]. , 1971, Tijdschrift voor ziekenverpleging.

[27]  Manfred Becker,et al.  Roloff/Matek machineonderdelen : normering, berekening, vormgeving , 2007 .

[28]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  The Pneumatic Biped “Lucy” Actuated with Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles , 2005, Auton. Robots.

[29]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Expressing Emotions with the Social Robot Probo , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[30]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Design of the humanoid robot KOBIAN - preliminary analysis of facial and whole body emotion expression capabilities- , 2008, Humanoids 2008 - 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[31]  A. Billard,et al.  Building Robota, a Mini-Humanoid Robot for the Rehabilitation of Children With Autism , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[32]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[33]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  AIBO: Toward the Era of Digital Creatures , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..