Phantom study of the impact of reconstruction parameters on the detection of mini- and micro-volume lesions with a low-dose PET/CT acquisition protocol.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Wolfgang A Weber,et al. Quantitative analysis of PET studies. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[2] Bernhard Sattler,et al. PET/CT (and CT) instrumentation, image reconstruction and data transfer for radiotherapy planning. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[3] Gerry Gillen,et al. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time , 2010, Nuclear medicine communications.
[4] Robert Jeraj,et al. A method for partial volume correction of PET-imaged tumor heterogeneity using expectation maximization with a spatially varying point spread function , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.
[5] W. Oyen,et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[6] Suleman Surti,et al. A recovery coefficient method for partial volume correction of PET images , 2009, Annals of nuclear medicine.
[7] P E Kinahan,et al. Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.
[8] David W Townsend,et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[9] M. Rudoni,et al. Impact of target-to-background ratio, target size, emission scan duration, and activity on physical figures of merit for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner. , 2007, Medical physics.
[10] J. Knuuti,et al. Performance of the new generation of whole-body PET/CT scanners: Discovery STE and Discovery VCT , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[11] I. Buvat,et al. Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[12] S. Libutti,et al. Partial-Volume Correction in PET: Validation of an Iterative Postreconstruction Method with Phantom and Patient Data , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[13] M C Gilardi,et al. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study. , 2007, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....
[14] Alain Seret,et al. Number of iterations when comparing MLEM/OSEM with FBP. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[15] R. Boellaard,et al. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[16] Brian F. Hutton,et al. A clinical perspective of accelerated statistical reconstruction , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[17] Lilli Geworski,et al. Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[18] A E Burgess,et al. The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[19] Richard L. Wahl,et al. Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.