AAC use and service provision: A survey of New Zealand speech-language therapists

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) services for people with complex communication needs in New Zealand were investigated by surveying speech-language therapists. Two separate survey forms were developed and mailed to speech-language therapists who worked with either students or adults. In both survey forms, information was requested about (a) the provision of AAC intervention, (b) the professional needs of speech-language therapists providing AAC services, and (c) demographic information about students with complex communication needs. Low-tech communication options and sign language were the most commonly reported AAC strategies used by adults and students with complex communication needs. Students aged 5 – 10 years received the most AAC intervention. Cerebral palsy, intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorders were the most commonly reported etiologies of students who used AAC. A total of 86% of the respondents indicated a desire for further AAC information or training.

[1]  M. Fried-Oken,et al.  Speaking up and spelling it out : personal essays on augmentative and alternative communication , 2000 .

[2]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults , 1995 .

[3]  A F Newell,et al.  A survey of the communication-impaired population of Tayside. , 1992, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[4]  S. Balandin,et al.  AAC and Australian speech pathologists: report on a national survey , 1998 .

[5]  F. DeRuyter,et al.  The nonspeaking brain-injured: A clinical and demographic database report , 1987 .

[6]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[7]  Harald Martinsen,et al.  Introduction to augmentative and alternative communication : sign teaching and the use of communication aids for children, adolescents and adults with developmental disorders , 2000 .

[8]  The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 1998. Autism: two-way interplay between research and clinical work. , 1999, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[9]  A. Russell,et al.  Use of AAC by individuals with acquired neurologic communication disabilities: Results of an Australian survey , 1995 .

[10]  Ivana Marková,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: Demographic survey , 1995 .

[11]  Marcia J. Scherer,et al.  Living in the state of stuck : how assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities , 2005 .

[12]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders , 2000 .

[13]  F. DeRuyter,et al.  The nonspeaking cerebral palsied: A clinical and demographic database report , 1987 .

[14]  Eleanor Moodie,et al.  Training staff to support AAC users in Scotland: current status and needs , 1998 .

[15]  Andrew Jinks,et al.  Consumer response to AAC devices: Acquisition, training, use, and satisfaction , 1994 .

[16]  Students with little or no functional speech in schools for students with severe mental retardation in South Africa , 1999 .

[17]  Julia King Preliminary Survey of Speech-Language Pathologists Providing AAC Services in Health Care Settings in Nebraska , 1998 .

[18]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Survey of school speech and language service provision to students with severe communication impairments in Nebraska , 1998 .

[19]  J. Watt,et al.  The 1981 New Zealand census of population and dwellings , 1969 .

[20]  H. Johnson,et al.  A statewide demographic survey of people with severe communication impairments , 1990 .

[21]  J. Rosenthal SPEECH PATHOLOGY , 1978, Medical Journal of Australia.

[22]  M L Wehmeyer,et al.  National survey of the use of assistive technology by adults with mental retardation. , 1998, Mental retardation.

[23]  Comparison of Sign alone and in combination with an electronic communication device in early language intervention: Case study , 1995 .

[24]  C. Kiernan,et al.  Signs and symbols : a review of literature and survey of the use of non-vocal communication systems , 1982 .

[25]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Identifying the nonspeaking population: a demographic study , 1985 .

[26]  W. Fisher,et al.  A North Dakota Prevalence Study of Nonverbal School-Age Children , 1988 .

[27]  M. Rutter,et al.  The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 1998. Autism: two-way interplay between research and clinical work. , 1999, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[28]  J. Light,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. , 1998, Journal of communication disorders.