Exploring the software engineering component in MIS research

he academic study of management information systems (MIS) is a recent addition to most universities. Because of its arrival, because of the youth of business schools compared to other colleges in universities, and because of the insecurity and uncertainty that marks youth, its study is accompanied by introspective smdies and commentaries about what MIS is and what it should accomplish. As recently as 1980, a founder of the field, Peter Keen, wrote, " At present, MIS research is a theme rather than a substantive field , Perhaps MIS is only a theme , Perhaps MIS will eventually be absorbed into other more clearly-defined disciplines, such as accounting ([141, p. 3. " During the 1980s MlS emerged as a scientific field, although a fragmented and pluralistic one. Davis [6] lists the MIS important reference disciplines as computer science, behavioral science, decision science, organizations and management, organizational functions, management accounting, and microeconomics. Culnan and Swanson [3] simplify this list to three components: computer science, management science, and organization science. We can safely characterize the field of MIS as

[1]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A Co-Citation Analysis , 1987, MIS Q..

[2]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The management of information systems , 1985 .

[3]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Reuse and Productivity in Integrated Computer-Aided Software Engineering: An Empirical Study , 1991, MIS Q..

[4]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  Message Management Systems: Concepts, Motivations, and Strategic Effects , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  MIS research: a profile of leading journals and universities , 1984, DATB.

[6]  Caroline M. Eastman Education for research in software engineering , 1988 .

[7]  Richard E. Fairley The role of academe in software engineering education , 1986, CSC '86.

[8]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems, 1980-1984: Points of Work and Reference , 1986, MIS Q..

[9]  Robert L. Glass Editor's corner : How can computer science truly become a science, and software engineering truly become engineering? , 1989, J. Syst. Softw..

[10]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  A quantitative analysis of U.S. and Japanese practice and performance in software development , 1990 .

[11]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[12]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Incorporating Behavioral Techniques Into the Systems Development Life Cycle , 1989, MIS Q..

[13]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[14]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[15]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Mis Research: Reference disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition , 1980, ICIS.

[16]  Gene Kusekoski Corporate videotex: a strategic business information system , 1989 .

[17]  Toby J. Teorey,et al.  ER model clustering as an aid for user communication and documentation in database design , 1989, CACM.

[18]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  David M. Lane,et al.  Impact of a restricted natural language interface on ease of learning and productivity , 1989, CACM.

[20]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems , 1980 .