Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization

Organizations continue to invest heavily in personal computers for their knowledge workers. When use is optional, however, having access to the technology by no means ensures it will be used or used effectively. To help us gain a better understanding of factors that influence the use of personal computers, researchers have recently adopted the theory of reasoned action proposed by Fishbein and Azjen (1975). This study uses a competing theory of behavior proposed by Triandis (1980). Responses were collected from 212 knowledge workers in nine divisions of a multi-national firm, and the measures and research hypotheses were analyzed using partial least squares (PLS). The results show that social norms and three components of expected consequences (complexity of use, fit between the job and PC capabilities, and long-term consequences) have a strong influence on utilization. These findings confirm the importance of the expected consequences of using PC technology, suggesting that training programs and organizational policies could be instituted to enhance or modify these expectations.

[1]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Is Attitudes: toward Theoretical and Definition Clarity , 1986, ICIS.

[2]  Gerardine De Sanctis,et al.  Expectancy Theory as an Explanation of Voluntary Use of a Decision-Support System: , 1983 .

[3]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  A Study of Success and Failure in Industrial Innovation , 1973 .

[4]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A second generation of multivariate analysis , 1982 .

[5]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Mis Research: Reference disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition , 1980, ICIS.

[6]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[7]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[8]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Morcom Lunt,et al.  Factors of success , 1989 .

[10]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[11]  H. Wold.  Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares , 1983 .

[12]  R. A. Grant,et al.  Building and testing a causal model of an information technology's impact , 1989, ICIS '89.

[13]  Jr. Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Performance and the Use of an Information System , 1975 .

[14]  C. Schewe.  The Management Information System User: An Exploratory Behavioral Analysis , 1976 .

[15]  H. Triandis.  Attitude and attitude change , 1971 .

[16]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  I/S attitudes: toward theoretical and definitional clarity , 2013, DATB.

[17]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-User Computing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[19]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[20]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[21]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[22]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[23]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Managerial attitudes and performance , 1968 .

[24]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Effects of individual characteristics, organizational factors and task characteristics on computer programmer productivity and job satisfaction , 1984, Inf. Manag..

[25]  C. Higgins,et al.  Work-family conflict in the dual-career family , 1992 .

[26]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[27]  David Jobber,et al.  Behavioural aspects of marketing information systems , 1986 .

[28]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[29]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[30]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[31]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation , 1978, MIS Q..

[32]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Measuring user attitudes in MIS research: a review , 1982 .

[33]  Carol Anne Beatty,et al.  The implementation of technological change: a field study of computer aided design , 1986 .

[34]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Factors of success for end-user computing , 1988, CACM.

[35]  Thomas J. Page,et al.  An Examination of the Convergent, Discriminant, and Predictive Validity of Fishbein's Behavioral Intention Model , 1982 .