Membrane fouling during filtration of milk––a microstructural study

Abstract The surface morphology and internal microstructure of a membrane are the result of membrane manufacturing processes and subsequent use during fluid processing in industry. Both these structural factors have a great effect on fouling and filtration performance. In this study, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were used to comprehensively characterise the surface of unused microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes, the fouled layer on the surface of membranes used for milk filtration and the internal fouling within the used membranes. A simple and effective sample preparation method was developed to study the internal membrane structure using high-resolution field emission SEM with low-accelerating voltage. Various methods of structural characterisation were compared and the results showed that for flat sheet membranes AFM is an appropriate and convenient technique for examining the surface topography of membranes. In contrast SEM is a very appropriate technique for examining the cross-sectional and internal structure of a membrane, either unused or fouled. Using these complimentary techniques it has been shown that internal fouling, during filtration of skim milk, proceeds by protein–polymer and protein–protein interactions. A gel layer forms on the surface of the membrane and has been imaged using SEM. This layer is slightly compressible and densifies as it grows. Fouling initiation commences after a very short filtration time.

[1]  M. J. Lewis Ultrafiltration membranes and application: Edited by A. R. Cooper. Plenum Press, New York, 1980, xiv + 707 pp. ISBN 0-306-40548-2 , 1982 .

[2]  D. Stamatialis,et al.  Atomic force microscopy of dense and asymmetric cellulose-based membranes , 1999 .

[3]  R. Jost,et al.  Protein composition of micellar casein obtained by cross-flow micro-filtration of skimmed milk , 1999 .

[4]  B. Girard,et al.  Influence of membrane structure on fouling layer morphology during apple juice clarification , 1998 .

[5]  Syed S. H. Rizvi,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a uniform transmembrane pressure crossflow microfiltration unit for the concentration of micellar casein from skim milk , 2001 .

[6]  D. Barbano,et al.  Characterization of Proteinaceous Membrane Foulants and Flux Decline During the Early Stages of Whole Milk Ultrafiltration , 1988 .

[7]  M. Farid,et al.  Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration of Milk , 1999 .

[8]  K. Ingham,et al.  Separation of Macromolecules by Ultrafiltration: Influence of Protein Adsorption, Protein-Protein Interactions, and Concentration Polarization , 1980 .

[9]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration , 1994 .

[10]  Richard D. Noble,et al.  Membrane separations technology : principles and applications , 1995 .

[11]  M. Jaffrin,et al.  Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of UHT skim milk with a vibrating membrane module , 2002 .

[12]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  The effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity: A literature review , 1993 .

[13]  X. D. Chen,et al.  Surface characterization of four industrial spray-dried dairy powders in relation to chemical composition, structure and wetting property , 2002 .

[14]  A. Fane,et al.  Ultrafiltration of Colloidal Silver Particles: Flux, Rejection, and Fouling , 1993 .