Real time hybrid simulation with online model updating: An analysis of accuracy

Abstract In conventional hybrid simulation (HS) and real time hybrid simulation (RTHS) applications, the information exchanged between the experimental substructure and numerical substructure is typically restricted to the interface boundary conditions (force, displacement, acceleration, etc.). With additional demands being placed on RTHS and recent advances in recursive system identification techniques, an opportunity arises to improve the fidelity by extracting information from the experimental substructure. Online model updating algorithms enable the numerical model of components (herein named the target model), that are similar to the physical specimen to be modified accordingly. This manuscript demonstrates the power of integrating a model updating algorithm into RTHS (RTHSMU) and explores the possible challenges of this approach through a practical simulation. Two Bouc–Wen models with varying levels of complexity are used as target models to validate the concept and evaluate the performance of this approach. The constrained unscented Kalman filter (CUKF) is selected for using in the model updating algorithm. The accuracy of RTHSMU is evaluated through an estimation output error indicator, a model updating output error indicator, and a system identification error indicator. The results illustrate that, under applicable constraints, by integrating model updating into RTHS, the global response accuracy can be improved when the target model is unknown. A discussion on model updating parameter sensitivity to updating accuracy is also presented to provide guidance for potential users.

[1]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large‐scale real‐time hybrid simulation of a three‐story steel frame building with magneto‐rheological dampers , 2014 .

[2]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[3]  Rudolph van der Merwe,et al.  The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373).

[4]  Viswanath Kammula,et al.  Model updating method for substructure pseudo‐dynamic hybrid simulation , 2013 .

[5]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Quasi-Static Cyclic Behavior of Controlled Rocking Steel Frames , 2014 .

[6]  M. Menegotto Method of Analysis for Cyclically Loaded R. C. Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behavior of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending , 1973 .

[7]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[8]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Generalized Bouc-Wen model for highly asymmetric hysteresis , 2006 .

[9]  Richard Christenson,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Verification of Semiactive Control through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2008 .

[10]  Dan Simon,et al.  Constrained Kalman filtering via density function truncation for turbofan engine health estimation , 2010, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[11]  Costanzo Manes,et al.  Comparative Study of Unscented Kalman Filter and Extended Kalman Filter for Position/Attitude Estimation in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2008 .

[12]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[13]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development, potential, and limitations of real–time online (pseudo–dynamic) testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing , 1985 .

[15]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large-scale real-time hybrid simulation for evaluation of advanced damping system performance , 2015 .

[16]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Application of Pseudodynamic Test Method to Structural Research , 1996 .

[17]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures , 2000 .

[18]  Thomas T. Baber,et al.  Random Vibration Hysteretic, Degrading Systems , 1981 .

[19]  Mohammed Ismail,et al.  The Hysteresis Bouc-Wen Model, a Survey , 2009 .

[20]  H. Zhang,et al.  Parameter Analysis of the Differential Model of Hysteresis , 2004 .

[21]  Jan Wendel,et al.  A Performance Comparison of Tightly Coupled GPS/INS Navigation Systems based on Extended and Sigma Point Kalman Filters , 2005 .

[22]  Mohammad Noori,et al.  Random Vibration of Degrading, Pinching Systems , 1985 .

[23]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Real-Time Dynamic Model Updating of a Hysteretic Structural System , 2014 .

[24]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Earthquake resilient steel braced frames with controlled rocking and energy dissipating fuses , 2011 .

[25]  Leonardo A. B. Tôrres,et al.  On unscented Kalman filtering with state interval constraints , 2010 .

[26]  Andrew W. Smyth,et al.  Real-time parameter estimation for degrading and pinching hysteretic models , 2008 .

[27]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory , 1961 .

[28]  Bin Wu,et al.  Model updating with constrained unscented Kalman filter for hybrid testing , 2014 .

[29]  John L. Crassidis Sigma-point Kalman filtering for integrated GPS and inertial navigation , 2006 .

[30]  Hongbin Ren,et al.  Vehicle State Information Estimation with the Unscented Kalman Filter , 2014 .

[31]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Implementation of online model updating in hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[32]  M. Nakashima,et al.  Japanese Activities on On‐Line Testing , 1987 .

[33]  Fabio Casciati,et al.  Stochastic dynamics of hysteretic media , 1989 .