The Musculoskeletal Knowledge Portal: Making Omics Data Useful to the Broader Scientific Community

The development of high‐throughput genotyping technologies and large biobank collections, complemented with rapid methodological advances in statistical genetics, has enabled hypothesis‐free genome‐wide association studies (GWAS), which have identified hundreds of genetic variants across many loci associated with musculoskeletal conditions. Similarly, basic scientists have valuable molecular cellular and animal data based on musculoskeletal disease that would be enhanced by being able to determine the human translation of their findings. By integrating these large‐scale human genomic musculoskeletal datasets with complementary evidence from model organisms, new and existing genetic loci can be statistically fine‐mapped to plausibly causal variants, candidate genes, and biological pathways. Genes and pathways identified using this approach can be further prioritized as drug targets, including side‐effect profiling and the potential for new indications. To bring together these big data, and to realize the vision of creating a knowledge portal, the International Federation of Musculoskeletal Research Societies (IFMRS) established a working group to collaborate with scientists from the Broad Institute to create the Musculoskeletal Knowledge Portal (MSK‐KP)(http://mskkp.org/). The MSK consolidates omics datasets from humans, cellular experiments, and model organisms into a central repository that can be accessed by researchers. The vision of the MSK‐KP is to enable better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying musculoskeletal disease and apply this knowledge to identify and develop new disease interventions. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

[1]  Daniel Sinnett,et al.  Population genomics in a disease targeted primary cell model. , 2009, Genome research.

[2]  Dermot F. Reilly,et al.  Phenome-wide association studies across large population cohorts support drug target validation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[3]  F. Rivadeneira,et al.  Osteoporosis and Bone Mass Disorders: From Gene Pathways to Treatments , 2016, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[4]  F. Dudbridge,et al.  Characterisation of genetic regulatory effects for osteoporosis risk variants in human osteoclasts , 2020, Genome Biology.

[5]  Masa Umicevic Mirkov,et al.  A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  D. Kiel,et al.  Genetics of Bone and Muscle Interactions in Humans , 2019, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

[7]  Beth Wilmot,et al.  Edinburgh Explorer Whole-genome sequencing identifies EN1 as a determinant of bone density and fracture , 2022 .

[8]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? , 2003, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  Pardis C Sabeti,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome , 2001, Nature.

[10]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Enhancing GTEx by bridging the gaps between genotype, gene expression, and disease , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Toby King,et al.  The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. , 2016, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  T. Spector,et al.  The heritability of bone mineral density, ultrasound of the calcaneus and hip axis length: A study of postmenopausal twins , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  Judith T. Lewis,et al.  Systematically Prioritizing Candidates in Genome-Based Drug Repurposing , 2019, Assay and drug development technologies.

[14]  Andrew D. Johnson,et al.  GWAS analysis of handgrip and lower body strength in older adults in the CHARGE consortium , 2016, Aging cell.

[15]  Yakir A Reshef,et al.  Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[16]  P. Croucher,et al.  Rapid phenotyping of knockout mice to identify genetic determinants of bone strength , 2016, The Journal of endocrinology.

[17]  T. Vincent,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Identification of new therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis through genome-wide analyses of UK Biobank data. , 2019, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

[18]  D. Hoy,et al.  Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions , 2018, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[19]  M. Pirinen,et al.  Prospects of Fine-Mapping Trait-Associated Genomic Regions by Using Summary Statistics from Genome-wide Association Studies. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  B. A.,et al.  Disease model discovery from 3,328 gene knockouts by The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium , 2018, Yearbook of Paediatric Endocrinology.

[21]  D. Kiel,et al.  Assessment of the genetic and clinical determinants of fracture risk: genome wide association and mendelian randomisation study , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[22]  A. Earnest,et al.  Chronic disease and labour force participation among older Australians , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[23]  Julian M. W. Quinn,et al.  An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes , 2015, Nature.

[25]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  O Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. , 1996, BMJ.

[27]  Shaun M. Purcell,et al.  Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  Stephen C. J. Parker,et al.  Large meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies five loci for lean body mass , 2017, Nature Communications.

[29]  Kyle J. Gaulton,et al.  Large-scale GWAS identifies multiple loci for hand grip strength providing biological insights into muscular fitness , 2017, Nature Communications.

[30]  Julian M. W. Quinn,et al.  An Atlas of Human and Murine Genetic Influences on Osteoporosis , 2018, bioRxiv.

[31]  Fiona M Blyth,et al.  Musculoskeletal Health Conditions Represent a Global Threat to Healthy Aging: A Report for the 2015 World Health Organization World Report on Ageing and Health. , 2016, The Gerontologist.

[32]  E. Birney,et al.  Using human genetics to make new medicines , 2015, Nature reviews genetics.

[33]  F. Dudbridge,et al.  Expression Quantitative Trait Locus Study of Bone Mineral Density GWAS Variants in Human Osteoclasts , 2018, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  L. Cardon,et al.  Use of genome-wide association studies for drug repositioning , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  E. Heard,et al.  Topologically Associating Domains in Chromosome Architecture and Gene Regulatory Landscapes during Development, Disease, and Evolution. , 2017, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[36]  D. Sillence,et al.  Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2019 revision , 2019, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[37]  Niamh M. Ryan,et al.  Identification of a novel locus on chromosome 2q13, which predisposes to clinical vertebral fractures independently of bone density , 2017, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[38]  Wen Zhang,et al.  A Bayesian Framework for Multiple Trait Colocalization from Summary Association Statistics , 2017, bioRxiv.

[39]  Daniel L. Koller,et al.  Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[40]  ENCODEConsortium,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[41]  Carol A. Bocchini,et al.  A new face and new challenges for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®) , 2011, Human mutation.

[42]  Sandro G. da Silva,et al.  Artificial intelligence on the identification of risk groups for osteoporosis, a general review , 2018, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[43]  Yurii S. Aulchenko,et al.  Twenty bone mineral density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[44]  L. Karssen,et al.  Insight into the genetic architecture of back pain and its risk factors from a study of 509,000 individuals. , 2019, Pain.

[45]  L. Karssen,et al.  Insight into the genetic architecture of back pain and its risk factors from a study of 509,000 individuals , 2018, bioRxiv.

[46]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  MendelVar: gene prioritization at GWAS loci using phenotypic enrichment of Mendelian disease genes , 2020, bioRxiv.

[47]  D. Kiel,et al.  Novel Genetic Variants Associated With Increased Vertebral Volumetric BMD, Reduced Vertebral Fracture Risk, and Increased Expression of SLC1A3 and EPHB2 , 2016, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[48]  William Jones,et al.  The open targets post-GWAS analysis pipeline , 2020, Bioinform..

[49]  Alex H. Wagner,et al.  DGIdb 3.0: a redesign and expansion of the drug–gene interaction database , 2017, bioRxiv.

[50]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.

[51]  Joris M. Mooij,et al.  MAGMA: Generalized Gene-Set Analysis of GWAS Data , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..