Mechanical Properties of Nanoscale Ceramics

The mechanism of deformation in nanosize ceramics occur either by dislocation motion or by grain boundary sliding depending on the size of the grains. In nanoceramics of grain size above ~100 nm the main deformation mechanism is by dislocation motion. At ultra-fine nano grain sizes below ~100 nm in the range <50 nm, the deformation mechanism is by grain boundary sliding. Dislocations cannot be accommodated conveniently in such nanosize materials and are prevented from motion and interactions. At levels in the hundreds of nanosized grains, a probable partial-dislocation mechanism may occur concurrently with other deformation mechanisms such as grain boundary sliding. For grain boundary sliding atomic mobility is essential, which results in a metal-like plasticity in nanoscale ceramics. One is interested in the behavior of nanoceramics under applied loads; therefore the various responses effecting static mechanical properties (tension–compression, hardness, etc.) time-dependent deformation (creep) and cyclic (fatigue) deformation are relevant. Making ceramics superplastic requires producing ultra-fine grains in the lower nanosize level, preferentially below 50 nm or even less. Various sophisticated techniques have been developed over the past decade or so, such that certain nanoceramics can now be produced with some measure of superplasticity. Superplastic materials may be thinned down, usually in a uniform manner, before breaking, without neck formation. The actual deformation mechanism is still under debate and may be material-dependent as well. Despite the various views on the exact mechanism responsible for the observed nano-behavior, it is clear from the experiments that nanoceramics may exhibit increased strength (hardness, for example), improved toughness, improved ductility and high resistance to fatigue. All these improved properties serve as safeguards against unexpected or premature fracture in service.

[1]  A. Mukherjee,et al.  Highly Creep-Resistant Silicon Nitride/Silicon Carbide Nano–Nano Composites , 2006 .

[2]  D. Hasselman,et al.  Evaluation ofKIc of brittle solids by the indentation method with low crack-to-indent ratios , 1982 .

[3]  L. Dubrovinsky,et al.  Superhard nanocomposite of dense polymorphs of boron nitride: Noncarbon material has reached diamond hardness , 2007 .

[4]  D. Mari,et al.  Multi-walled carbon nanotube/nanostructured zirconia composites: Outstanding mechanical properties in a wide range of temperature , 2011 .

[5]  Ming Du,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical properties of alumina ceramics reinforced by boron nitride nanotubes , 2011 .

[6]  B. Jiang,et al.  Defect structure and physical properties of barium titanate ultra-fine particles , 2000 .

[7]  Brian R. Lawn,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of Indentation Techniques for Measuring Fracture Toughness: I , 1981 .

[8]  Young‐Wook Kim,et al.  Grain Growth and Fracture Toughness of Fine‐Grained Silicon Carbide Ceramics , 1995 .

[9]  Doh-Yeon Kim,et al.  Microstructure and properties of spark plasma-sintered ZrO2-ZrB2 nanoceramic composites , 2006 .

[10]  Luke L. Y. Chang,et al.  Phase Relations in the Systems A2O‐Metal Oxide‐WO3 (A=Li, Na; Metal=Fe, Cr, Sn, Zr, Th, V) , 1981 .

[11]  Kei Miyamoto,et al.  Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Nano-SiC–Al2O3 Composites Densified by Spark Plasma Sintering , 1999 .

[12]  J. Tse,et al.  Hardness of nanocrystalline diamonds , 2006 .

[13]  J. Venables Deformation twinning in face-centred cubic metals , 1961 .

[14]  R. M. Spriggs,et al.  Strength-Grain Size-Porosity Relations in Alumina , 1965 .

[15]  E. Hall,et al.  The Deformation and Ageing of Mild Steel: III Discussion of Results , 1951 .

[16]  Dustin M. Hulbert,et al.  Superplasticity of zirconia-alumina-spinel nanoceramic composite by spark plasma sintering of plasma sprayed powders , 2005 .

[17]  Y. Motohashi,et al.  Variation in some mechanical properties of Y-TZP caused by superplastic compressive deformation , 1997 .

[18]  A. Evans,et al.  Elastic/Plastic Indentation Damage in Ceramics: The Median/Radial Crack System , 1980 .

[19]  T. Nishimura,et al.  New strategies for preparing nanosized silicon nitride ceramics , 2005 .

[20]  M. Meyers,et al.  Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials , 2006 .

[21]  M. Reece,et al.  Enhanced Creep Resistant Silicon‐Nitride‐Based Nanocomposite , 2005 .

[22]  R. Ghodssi,et al.  Nano-scale fatigue study of LPCVD silicon nitride thin films using a mechanical-amplifier actuator , 2007 .

[23]  J.C.M. Li Disclination model of high angle grain boundaries , 1972 .

[24]  R. Averback,et al.  Sintering and grain growth in nanocrystalline ceramics , 1992 .

[25]  Y. Sakka,et al.  Low‐Temperature Processing and Mechanical Properties of Zirconia and Zirconia–Alumina Nanoceramics , 2003 .

[26]  J. Pelleg Mechanical Properties of Materials , 2012 .

[27]  Bin Wen,et al.  Ultrahard nanotwinned cubic boron nitride , 2013, Nature.

[28]  Chuanzhen Huang,et al.  Effect of special microstructure on the mechanical properties of nanocomposite , 2008 .

[29]  George J. Weng,et al.  A theory of compressive yield strength of nano-grained ceramics , 2004 .

[30]  N. Petch The upper yield stress of polycrystalline iron , 1964 .

[31]  Xiaoxu Huang,et al.  Revealing the Maximum Strength in Nanotwinned Copper , 2009, Science.

[32]  Koji Takahashi,et al.  Fatigue Strength of an Al 2 O 3 /SiC Composite and a Monolithic Al 2 O 3 Subjected to Crack-Healing Treatment , 2003 .