Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T.

PURPOSE To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging based on standard single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in patients with breast cancer at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Forty-seven patients with 49 histopathologically verified lesions were included in this study. In all patients, DW imaging, with single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with comparable imaging parameters, was performed with a 3.0-T MR imager. Two independent readers visually assessed image quality and lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, geometric distortions) were quantified. Regions of interest were drawn in all lesions (28 malignant, 21 benign) and in the normal breast parenchyma to investigate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on the basis of an ADC threshold of 1.25 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec. RESULTS Each reader found a higher diagnostic accuracy for readout-segmented (96%) than for single-shot (90%) echo-planar imaging. The area under the curve for readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (0.981) was significantly larger than for single-shot echo-planar imaging (0.867) (P = .026). There was no significant difference in the ADC obtained by using either DW imaging method. Lesion conspicuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging were rated superior to those of single-shot echo-planar imaging (P < .001). Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reduced geometric distortions by a factor of three. CONCLUSION DW imaging based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging provided significantly higher image quality and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by reducing geometric distortions, image blurring, and artifact level with a clinical high-field-strength MR imager. Thereby, readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reached a higher diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

[1]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[2]  Wolfgang Bogner,et al.  A Combined High Temporal and High Spatial Resolution 3 Tesla MR Imaging Protocol for the Assessment of Breast Lesions: Initial Results , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Naobumi Yashiro,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Half-Fourier Single-Shot Turbo Spin Echo Imaging in Breast Tumors: Differentiation of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma from Fibroadenoma , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  High resolution diffusion‐weighted imaging using readout‐segmented echo‐planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two‐dimensional navigator‐based reacquisition , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  T. Helbich,et al.  Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging at 3 T for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. , 2011, Radiology.

[6]  T. Helbich,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[7]  Wilma van der Riet,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) for the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions , 2009, European Radiology.

[8]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[9]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Ning-Yu An,et al.  Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Kuncheng Li,et al.  The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[12]  William E Grizzle,et al.  Breast tumor xenografts: diffusion-weighted MR imaging to assess early therapy with novel apoptosis-inducing anti-DR5 antibody. , 2008, Radiology.

[13]  D G Gadian,et al.  The effect of residual Nyquist ghost in quantitative echo‐planar diffusion imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Usha Sinha,et al.  In vivo diffusion‐weighted MRI of the breast: Potential for lesion characterization , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Wei Huang,et al.  Enhancing nonmass lesions in the breast: evaluation with proton (1H) MR spectroscopy. , 2007, Radiology.

[16]  S. Skare,et al.  Readout-segmented EPI for rapid high resolution diffusion imaging at 3 T. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[17]  A. Gentles,et al.  Clinical Application of Readout-Segmented− Echo-Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Pediatric Brain , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[18]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Parallel imaging performance as a function of field strength—An experimental investigation using electrodynamic scaling , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[20]  Qian Wu,et al.  Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[21]  U. Sharma,et al.  Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion‐weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[22]  Huanzhou Yu,et al.  Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  T. Helbich,et al.  MRI-Guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions: materials, techniques, success rates, and management in patients with suspected radiologic-pathologic mismatch. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[24]  E. Stejskal.  Use of Spin Echoes in a Pulsed Magnetic‐Field Gradient to Study Anisotropic, Restricted Diffusion and Flow , 1965 .

[25]  S. Skare,et al.  Robust GRAPPA‐accelerated diffusion‐weighted readout‐segmented (RS)‐EPI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Hiromu Nishitani,et al.  Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer , 2008, Radiation Medicine.

[27]  G C McKinnon,et al.  Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the normal breast using MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  D. Ortendahl,et al.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[29]  Evelyn Wenkel,et al.  Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[30]  C. Kuhl.  Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. , 2007, Radiology.

[31]  S. Duffy,et al.  High resolution MRI of the breast at 3 T: which BI-RADS® descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer? , 2012, European Radiology.

[32]  J. R. Reichenbach,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques , 2009, European Radiology.

[33]  Davide Caramella,et al.  The role of mean diffusivity (MD) as a predictive index of the response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a preliminary study , 2010, European Radiology.

[34]  Masahiko Watanabe,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Malignant Breast Tumors: The Usefulness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Value and ADC Map for the Detection of Malignant Breast Tumors and Evaluation of Cancer Extension , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[35]  Sh. Heywang Kobrunner.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast , 1994 .

[36]  L. Bonomo,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[37]  T. Helbich,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Improves Detection of Invasive Cancer, Preinvasive Cancer, and Premalignant Lesions during Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[38]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. , 2007, Radiology.

[39]  Shigeru Nawano,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value. , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[40]  T. Helbich,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? , 2009, Radiology.

[41]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[42]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. , 2010, Radiology.

[43]  S. Sinha,et al.  Recent advances in breast MRI and MRS , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[44]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[45]  S. Deoni,et al.  Transverse relaxation time (T2) mapping in the brain with off‐resonance correction using phase‐cycled steady‐state free precession imaging , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  Robert Turner,et al.  Diffusion imaging in humans at 7T using readout‐segmented EPI and GRAPPA , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[47]  A. Cilotti,et al.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion , 2007, European Radiology.

[48]  P. Summers,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of breast tumours , 2011, La radiologia medica.

[49]  David A. Bluemke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional 3.0-T , 2010 .

[50]  Z H Cho,et al.  Gradient reversal technique and its applications to chemical‐shift‐related NMR imaging , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.