Geometry regulates traction stresses in adherent cells.

Cells generate mechanical stresses via the action of myosin motors on the actin cytoskeleton. Although the molecular origin of force generation is well understood, we currently lack an understanding of the regulation of force transmission at cellular length scales. Here, using 3T3 fibroblasts, we experimentally decouple the effects of substrate stiffness, focal adhesion density, and cell morphology to show that the total amount of work a cell does against the substrate to which it is adhered is regulated by the cell spread area alone. Surprisingly, the number of focal adhesions and the substrate stiffness have little effect on regulating the work done on the substrate by the cell. For a given spread area, the local curvature along the cell edge regulates the distribution and magnitude of traction stresses to maintain a constant strain energy. A physical model of the adherent cell as a contractile gel under a uniform boundary tension and mechanically coupled to an elastic substrate quantitatively captures the spatial distribution and magnitude of traction stresses. With a single choice of parameters, this model accurately predicts the cell's mechanical output over a wide range of cell geometries.

[1]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[2]  M. Marchetti,et al.  Substrate rigidity deforms and polarizes active gels , 2011, 1106.0929.

[3]  Manuel Théry,et al.  A new micropatterning method of soft substrates reveals that different tumorigenic signals can promote or reduce cell contraction levels. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[4]  Shiladitya Banerjee,et al.  Controlling cell–matrix traction forces by extracellular geometry , 2012, 1211.5075.

[5]  Jason P. Gleghorn,et al.  Host epithelial geometry regulates breast cancer cell invasiveness , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Celeste M Nelson,et al.  Mapping of mechanical strains and stresses around quiescent engineered three-dimensional epithelial tissues. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Synergistic regulation of cell function by matrix rigidity and adhesive pattern. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[8]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[9]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of adhesion geometry and rigidity on cellular force distributions. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[10]  Brenton D. Hoffman,et al.  Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature.

[11]  Patrick W. Oakes,et al.  Dynamic and structural signatures of lamellar actomyosin force generation , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[12]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[13]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[15]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  Myosin II-Mediated Focal Adhesion Maturation Is Tension Insensitive , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  J. Alcaraz,et al.  Micropatterning of single endothelial cell shape reveals a tight coupling between nuclear volume in G1 and proliferation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Propagation of mechanical stress through the actin cytoskeleton toward focal adhesions: model and experiment. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Daniel A. Hammer,et al.  Endothelial Cell Traction Forces on RGD-Derivatized Polyacrylamide Substrata † , 2003 .

[19]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Substrate Stiffness and Cell Area Predict Cellular Traction Stresses in Single Cells and Cells in Contact , 2010, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[20]  Sangyoon J. Han,et al.  Decoupling substrate stiffness, spread area, and micropost density: a close spatial relationship between traction forces and focal adhesions. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[21]  C. M. Edwards,et al.  Force localization in contracting cell layers. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[22]  M. Marchetti,et al.  Optimal shapes and stresses of adherent cells on patterned substrates. , 2013, Soft matter.

[23]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Benoit Ladoux,et al.  Cytoskeletal coherence requires myosin-IIA contractility , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[25]  T. Lecuit,et al.  Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[27]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Spatiotemporal Feedback between Actomyosin and Focal-Adhesion Systems Optimizes Rapid Cell Migration , 2006, Cell.

[28]  Hiroshi Hosoya,et al.  Traction forces of fibroblasts are regulated by the Rho-dependent kinase but not by the myosin light chain kinase. , 2006, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[29]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  Patrick W Oakes,et al.  Preparation of complaint matrices for quantifying cellular contraction. , 2010, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[32]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[33]  Micah Dembo,et al.  The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[34]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Contractile network models for adherent cells. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Molecular architecture and function of matrix adhesions. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[37]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[38]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[39]  F. Vernerey,et al.  An XFEM‐based numerical strategy to model mechanical interactions between biological cells and a deformable substrate , 2012 .

[40]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[41]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[42]  E. M. Lifshitz,et al.  Course in Theoretical Physics , 2013 .

[43]  M. Marchetti,et al.  Contractile stresses in cohesive cell layers on finite-thickness substrates. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[44]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  United we stand – integrating the actin cytoskeleton and cell–matrix adhesions in cellular mechanotransduction , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[45]  M Cristina Marchetti,et al.  Scaling of traction forces with the size of cohesive cell colonies. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[46]  Patrick W Oakes,et al.  Spatiotemporal constraints on the force-dependent growth of focal adhesions. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[47]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Ning Wang,et al.  Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[49]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Filamin depletion blocks endoplasmic spreading and destabilizes force-bearing adhesions , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[50]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Margaret L. Gardel,et al.  Tension is required but not sufficient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress fiber template , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[52]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[53]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions , 2008 .

[54]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[55]  Matthew J. Paszek,et al.  Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.