Machine Learning Application With Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection of Hemorrhagic Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

Clinical features are the primary measures used for risk assessment of cerebrovascular diseases. However, clinical features, especially angioarchitecture, in digital subtraction angiography require further interpretation by specialized radiologists. This approach for risk assessment requires multivariable analysis and is, therefore, challenging when completed manually. In this study, we employed three machine learning models, namely the random forest, naïve Bayes classifier, and support vector machine, for the detection of hemorrhagic brain arteriovenous malformations using digital subtraction angiography. Quantitative measurements from digital subtraction angiography were used as features, and the chi-squared test, minimum redundancy maximum relevance, ReliefF, and two-sample $t$ tests were used for feature selection. Bayesian optimization was conducted to optimize the hyperparameters of the three models. The random forest model outperformed the other two models. As a human control, three radiologists diagnosed an independent testing data set. The random forest model had a computation time of less than a second for the whole data set for classification. Accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 92.7% and 0.98 for the training data set and 85.7% and 0.97 for the independent testing data set, respectively. Compared with the mean diagnosis time of approximately half a minute per patient and the highest accuracy of 76.2% for the three radiologists, the random forest model was faster and more accurate for our data set. These results suggest that the machine learning model based on hemodynamic features from quantitative digital subtraction angiography is a promising tool for detecting hemorrhagic brain arteriovenous malformations.

[1]  J Pile-Spellman,et al.  Reporting terminology for brain arteriovenous malformation clinical and radiographic features for use in clinical trials. , 2001, Stroke.

[2]  V. Vakharia,et al.  Prediction of compressive strength and portland cement composition using cross-validation and feature ranking techniques , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[3]  Fenghua Chen,et al.  A Reanalysis of Predictors for the Risk of Hemorrhage in Brain Arteriovenous Malformation. , 2018, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[4]  Seyed Amir Naghibi,et al.  Application of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Genetic Algorithm Optimized Random Forest Models in Groundwater Potential Mapping , 2017, Water Resources Management.

[5]  J Pile-Spellman,et al.  Feeding artery pressure and venous drainage pattern are primary determinants of hemorrhage from cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1998, Stroke.

[6]  Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari,et al.  An Approach Based on Mutually Informed Neural Networks to Optimize the Generalization Capabilities of Decision Support Systems Developed for Heart Failure Prediction , 2020 .

[7]  Ce Zhu,et al.  Early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease from multiple voice recordings by simultaneous sample and feature selection , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Toward Optimal Feature Selection , 1996, ICML.

[9]  Y. Kao,et al.  Stasis index from hemodynamic analysis using quantitative DSA correlates with hemorrhage of supratentorial arteriovenous malformation: a cross-sectional study. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  J.-S. Hong,et al.  Validating the Automatic Independent Component Analysis of DSA , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  Ce Zhu,et al.  Automated Detection of Parkinson’s Disease Based on Multiple Types of Sustained Phonations Using Linear Discriminant Analysis and Genetically Optimized Neural Network , 2019, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[12]  Karin Baier Computer Models In Genetics , 2016 .

[13]  Jasper Snoek,et al.  Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms , 2012, NIPS.

[14]  Joachim Berkefeld,et al.  Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[15]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[16]  Masayuki Takeda,et al.  A comparison study between genetic algorithms and bayesian optimize algorithms by novel indices , 2005, GECCO '05.

[17]  C.-J. Lin,et al.  Quantifying the Cerebral Hemodynamics of Dural Arteriovenous Fistula in Transverse Sigmoid Sinus Complicated by Sinus Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[18]  C. Starmer,et al.  Indicator Transit Time Considered as a Gamma Variate , 1964, Circulation research.

[19]  Aki Laakso,et al.  NATURAL HISTORY OF BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS: A LONG‐TERM FOLLOW‐UP STUDY OF RISK OF HEMORRHAGE IN 238 PATIENTS , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[20]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Alex Rubinsteyn,et al.  Using a Machine Learning Approach to Predict Outcomes after Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Chris H. Q. Ding,et al.  Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data , 2003, Computational Systems Bioinformatics. CSB2003. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Bioinformatics Conference. CSB2003.

[23]  M. Kowarschik,et al.  Monitoring Peri-Therapeutic Cerebral Circulation Time: A Feasibility Study Using Color-Coded Quantitative DSA in Patients with Steno-Occlusive Arterial Disease , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[24]  S. Hung,et al.  Prolonged Cerebral Circulation Time Is the Best Parameter for Predicting Vasospasm during Initial CT Perfusion in Subarachnoid Hemorrhagic Patients , 2016, PloS one.

[25]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  RUSBoost: Improving classification performance when training data is skewed , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[26]  Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari,et al.  LDA–GA–SVM: improved hepatocellular carcinoma prediction through dimensionality reduction and genetically optimized support vector machine , 2020, Neural Computing and Applications.

[27]  Jin Pyeong Jeon,et al.  Machine Learning Application for Rupture Risk Assessment in Small-Sized Intracranial Aneurysm , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[28]  Walter Montanera,et al.  Angioarchitectural Factors Present in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Associated With Hemorrhagic Presentation , 2002, Stroke.

[29]  Haim Levkowitz,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval (IR) , 2008 .

[30]  S. Schafer,et al.  Optimizing the Quality of 4D-DSA Temporal Information , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[31]  P. K. Kankar,et al.  A comparison of feature ranking techniques for fault diagnosis of ball bearing , 2016, Soft Comput..

[32]  Marko Robnik-Sikonja,et al.  Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF , 2003, Machine Learning.

[33]  Liliana Cesar,et al.  The mixability of angiographic contrast with arterial blood. , 2009, Medical physics.

[34]  Wuyang Yang,et al.  R 2 eD AVM Score: A Novel Predictive Tool for Arteriovenous Malformation Presentation With Hemorrhage , 2019 .

[35]  Tamer E. El-Diraby,et al.  Role of Data Analytics in Infrastructure Asset Management: Overcoming Data Size and Quality Problems , 2020, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements.

[36]  R F Spetzler,et al.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. , 1986, Journal of neurosurgery.

[37]  T. Valiante,et al.  A simple relationship between radiological arteriovenous malformation hemodynamics and clinical presentation: a prospective, blinded analysis of 31 cases. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[38]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  An Interior Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds , 1993, SIAM J. Optim..

[39]  Rodney A Gabriel,et al.  Ten-Year Detection Rate of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in a Large, Multiethnic, Defined Population , 2010, Stroke.

[40]  Michael T. Lawton,et al.  Delayed Venous Drainage in Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformations Based on Quantitative Color-Coded Digital Subtraction Angiography. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[41]  Ernest Fokoue,et al.  Robust Classification of High Dimension Low Sample Size Data , 2015, 1501.00592.

[42]  Yutaka Kai,et al.  Analysis of Mean Transit Time of Contrast Medium in Ruptured and Unruptured Arteriovenous Malformations: A Digital Subtraction Angiographic Study , 2003, Stroke.

[43]  Peter I. Frazier,et al.  A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization , 2018, ArXiv.

[44]  Y. Kao,et al.  Peritherapeutic Hemodynamic Changes of Carotid Stenting Evaluated with Quantitative DSA in Patients with Carotid Stenosis , 2016, American Journal of Neuroradiology.