Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Learning and Generalizing Hierarchical Rules in 8-Month-Old Infants

Recent research indicates that adults and infants spontaneously create and generalize hierarchical rule sets during incidental learning. Computational models and empirical data suggest that, in adults, this process is supported by circuits linking prefrontal cortex (PFC) with striatum and their modulation by dopamine, but the neural circuits supporting this form of learning in infants are largely unknown. We used near-infrared spectroscopy to record PFC activity in 8-month-old human infants during a simple audiovisual hierarchical-rule-learning task. Behavioral results confirmed that infants adopted hierarchical rule sets to learn and generalize spoken object–label mappings across different speaker contexts. Infants had increased activity over right dorsal lateral PFC when rule sets switched from one trial to the next, a neural marker related to updating rule sets into working memory in the adult literature. Infants' eye blink rate, a possible physiological correlate of striatal dopamine activity, also increased when rule sets switched from one trial to the next. Moreover, the increase in right dorsolateral PFC activity in conjunction with eye blink rate also predicted infants' generalization ability, providing exploratory evidence for frontostriatal involvement during learning. These findings provide evidence that PFC is involved in rudimentary hierarchical rule learning in 8-month-old infants, an ability that was previously thought to emerge later in life in concert with PFC maturation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Hierarchical rule learning is a powerful learning mechanism that allows rules to be selected in a context-appropriate fashion and transferred or reused in novel contexts. Data from computational models and adults suggests that this learning mechanism is supported by dopamine-innervated interactions between prefrontal cortex (PFC) and striatum. Here, we provide evidence that PFC also supports hierarchical rule learning during infancy, challenging the current dogma that PFC is an underdeveloped brain system until adolescence. These results add new insights into the neurobiological mechanisms available to support learning and generalization in very early postnatal life, providing evidence that PFC and the frontostriatal circuitry are involved in organizing learning and behavior earlier in life than previously known.

[1]  H Tada Spontaneous blinking during a visual tracking performance. , 1978, Fukushima journal of medical science.

[2]  P. Huttenlocher Synaptic density in human frontal cortex - developmental changes and effects of aging. , 1979, Brain research.

[3]  S. Potkin,et al.  Eye-blink rates and platelet monoamine oxidase activity in chronic schizophrenic patients. , 1980, Biological psychiatry.

[4]  C. Karson Spontaneous eye-blink rates and dopaminergic systems. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  D. Shukla Blin rate as clinical indicator , 1985, Neurology.

[6]  O. Blin,et al.  Apomorphine-induced blinking and yawning in healthy volunteers. , 1990, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[7]  R. Mailman,et al.  D1 and D2 dopamine receptors independently regulate spontaneous blink rate in the vervet monkey. , 1991, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[8]  J. Bodfish,et al.  Blink rate as an index of dopamine function in adults with mental retardation and repetitive behavior disorders. , 1995, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[9]  M. Kleven,et al.  Differential effects of direct and indirect dopamine agonists on eye blink rate in cynomolgus monkeys. , 1996, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[10]  G. Deuschl,et al.  Spontaneous and reflex activity of facial muscles in dystonia, Parkinson’s disease, and in normal subjects , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  S. Wise,et al.  Rule-dependent neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[13]  D. E. Redmond,et al.  Spontaneous Blink Rates Correlate with Dopamine Levels in the Caudate Nucleus of MPTP-Treated Monkeys , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[14]  Cristina Tassorelli,et al.  Functional changes of the basal ganglia circuitry in Parkinson's disease , 2000, Progress in Neurobiology.

[15]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries and individual differences in visual concept learning as measured by functional MRI , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[17]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Anatomical Segregation of Component Processes in an Inductive Inference Task , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Anterior prefrontal cortex mediates rule learning in humans. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  S. Bunge How we use rules to select actions: A review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  W. P. Smotherman,et al.  Spontaneous eye blinking in human infants: a review. , 2004, Developmental psychobiology.

[21]  E. Jutkiewicz,et al.  Effects of Dopamine D1 Ligands on Eye Blinking in Monkeys: Efficacy, Antagonism, and D1/D2 Interactions , 2004, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[22]  Kyosuke Fukuda,et al.  Cognition, blinks, eye-movements, and pupillary movements during performance of a running memory task. , 2005, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[23]  K. Lesch,et al.  Dopamine and cognitive control: the influence of spontaneous eyeblink rate and dopamine gene polymorphisms on perseveration and distractibility. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  P. Brugger,et al.  Blinking and schizotypal thinking , 2005, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[25]  Silvia A. Bunge,et al.  A Brain-Based Account of the Development of Rule Use in Childhood , 2006 .

[26]  P. Dayan,et al.  Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor , 2007, Psychopharmacology.

[27]  Carter Wendelken,et al.  Neurocognitive development of the ability to manipulate information in working memory. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  David A Boas,et al.  Hemodynamic response to featural changes in the occipital and inferior temporal cortex in infants: a preliminary methodological exploration. , 2008, Developmental science.

[29]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Reduced Spontaneous Eye Blink Rates in Recreational Cocaine Users: Evidence for Dopaminergic Hypoactivity , 2008, PloS one.

[30]  Teresa Wilcox,et al.  Hemodynamic changes in the infant cortex during the processing of featural and spatiotemporal information , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  D. Boas,et al.  HomER: a review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain. , 2009, Applied optics.

[32]  B. Hommel,et al.  Closing one's eyes to reality: Evidence for a dopaminergic basis of Psychoticism from spontaneous eye blink rates , 2009 .

[33]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain revealed with diffuse optical tomography , 2009, NeuroImage.

[34]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  Multiple Memory Systems Are Unnecessary to Account for Infant Memory Development: an Ecological Model Historical Perspective: Dichotomous Memory Systems , 2009 .

[35]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[36]  Nick Everdell,et al.  Social perception in infancy: a near infrared spectroscopy study. , 2009, Child development.

[37]  G. Taga,et al.  Development of Global Cortical Networks in Early Infancy , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Frank,et al.  Mechanisms of hierarchical reinforcement learning in corticostriatal circuits 1: computational analysis. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Jihoon Oh,et al.  The timing and temporal patterns of eye blinking are dynamically modulated by attention. , 2012, Human movement science.

[40]  Anne G E Collins,et al.  Cognitive control over learning: creating, clustering, and generalizing task-set structure. , 2013, Psychological review.

[41]  Michael J Frank,et al.  Human EEG Uncovers Latent Generalizable Rule Structure during Learning , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Etienne Koechlin,et al.  Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex , 2014, Science.

[43]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Top-down modulation in the infant brain: Learning-induced expectations rapidly affect the sensory cortex at 6 months , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Denise M Werchan,et al.  8-Month-Old Infants Spontaneously Learn and Generalize Hierarchical Rules , 2015, Psychological science.

[46]  David A. Boas,et al.  Anatomical guidance for functional near-infrared spectroscopy: AtlasViewer tutorial , 2015, Neurophotonics.

[47]  M. Frank,et al.  Spontaneous eye blink rate predicts learning from negative, but not positive, outcomes , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  M. Frank,et al.  Neural signature of hierarchically structured expectations predicts clustering and transfer of rule sets in reinforcement learning , 2016, Cognition.