The effects of conflict asymmetry on mediation outcomes: Satisfaction, work motivation and absenteeism

Purpose – This paper seeks to link conflict and mediation theory to practice using an asymmetry framework. Past conflict research often assumes that conflict parties perceive the same amount of conflict, neglecting that members may have different perceptions.Design/methodology/approach – This study conducted surveys and interviews with 30 conflict parties involved in mediation and examined the effects of asymmetry of parties' perceptions of task and relationship conflict on absenteeism, motivation, and satisfaction with the mediation. In addition, mediator bias was considered as another asymmetry variable that influences mediation success.Findings – Using quantitative and qualitative data it was found that these perceived asymmetries were negatively associated with work motivation and satisfaction, and positively associated with absenteeism.Originality/value – Recommendations for mediators and organizations are provided.

[1]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Negotiation in Social Conflict , 1993 .

[2]  R. Bush.  "What Do We Need a Mediator For?": Mediation's "Value-Added" for Negotiators , 1996 .

[3]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  The Mediation Process , 1987 .

[4]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[5]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[6]  W. Swann.  Resilient identities : self-relationships and the construction of social reality , 1999 .

[7]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[8]  Understanding mediation's role in preventive diplomacy , 1996 .

[9]  E. Kluwer,et al.  Gender-related inequalities in the division of family work in close relationships: A social psychological perspective , 2003 .

[10]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[11]  B. Major.  Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. , 1987 .

[12]  D. Andrich.  A rating formulation for ordered response categories , 1978 .

[13]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[14]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  Process and outcome in community mediation , 1995 .

[15]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  INTRAGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONFLICT-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP , 2003 .

[16]  A. Nauta,et al.  De mythe doorbroken : gezondheid en inzetbaarheid oudere werknemers , 2004 .

[17]  Ilan G. Gewurz.  Re)designing mediation to address the nuances of power imbalance , 2001 .

[18]  Linda Thompson,et al.  Family Work , 1991 .

[19]  C. M. Riordan,et al.  Demographic diversity and employee attitudes : An empirical examination of relational demography within work units , 1997 .

[20]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis. , 1992 .

[21]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[22]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[23]  P. Carnevale,et al.  General Alignment and Overt Support in Biased Mediation , 1991 .

[24]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[25]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PROPORTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT COMPOSITION ON TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[26]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[27]  J. Arnold.  MEDIATOR INSIGHT: DISPUTANTS' PERCEPTIONS OF THIRD PARTIES' KNOWLEDGE AND ITS EFFECT ON MEDIATED NEGOTIATION , 2000 .

[28]  W. Swann,et al.  Self-verification: The search for coherence , 2003 .

[29]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  T. Tyler,et al.  Procedural Justice in Organizations , 1988 .

[31]  William H. Ross,et al.  The effects of partisan third parties on negotiator behavior and outcome perceptions , 1993 .