Recruitment Kinetics of DNA Repair Proteins Mdc1 and Rad52 but Not 53BP1 Depend on Damage Complexity

The recruitment kinetics of double-strand break (DSB) signaling and repair proteins Mdc1, 53BP1 and Rad52 into radiation-induced foci was studied by live-cell fluorescence microscopy after ion microirradiation. To investigate the influence of damage density and complexity on recruitment kinetics, which cannot be done by UV laser irradiation used in former studies, we utilized 43 MeV carbon ions with high linear energy transfer per ion (LET = 370 keV/µm) to create a large fraction of clustered DSBs, thus forming complex DNA damage, and 20 MeV protons with low LET (LET  = 2.6 keV/µm) to create mainly isolated DSBs. Kinetics for all three proteins was characterized by a time lag period T0 after irradiation, during which no foci are formed. Subsequently, the proteins accumulate into foci with characteristic mean recruitment times τ1. Mdc1 accumulates faster (T0 = 17±2 s, τ1 = 98±11 s) than 53BP1 (T0 = 77±7 s, τ1 = 310±60 s) after high LET irradiation. However, recruitment of Mdc1 slows down (T0 = 73±16 s, τ1 = 1050±270 s) after low LET irradiation. The recruitment kinetics of Rad52 is slower than that of Mdc1, but exhibits the same dependence on LET. In contrast, the mean recruitment time τ1 of 53BP1 remains almost constant when varying LET. Comparison to literature data on Mdc1 recruitment after UV laser irradiation shows that this rather resembles recruitment after high than low LET ionizing radiation. So this work shows that damage quality has a large influence on repair processes and has to be considered when comparing different studies.

[1]  Frédérick A. Mallette,et al.  K48-linked ubiquitination and protein degradation regulate 53BP1 recruitment at DNA damage sites , 2012, Cell Research.

[2]  Sylvain V Costes,et al.  Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose-response nonlinearity in human cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Guanghua Du,et al.  Spatial Dynamics of DNA Damage Response Protein Foci along the Ion Trajectory of High-LET Particles , 2011, Radiation research.

[4]  C. Mielke,et al.  53BP1 and MDC1 foci formation in HT-1080 cells for low- and high-LET microbeam irradiations , 2011, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[5]  Marco Durante,et al.  DNA double-strand breaks in heterochromatin elicit fast repair protein recruitment, histone H2AX phosphorylation and relocation to euchromatin , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  J. Söding,et al.  The Mre11:Rad50 Structure Shows an ATP-Dependent Molecular Clamp in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair , 2011, Cell.

[7]  K. Prise,et al.  Spatiotemporal investigations of DNA damage repair using microbeams. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  C. Mielke,et al.  Online imaging of initial DNA damages at the PTB microbeam. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  N. Mailand,et al.  Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells. , 2010, DNA repair.

[10]  T. Pandita,et al.  Rad52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with BRCA2 deficiency , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Elledge,et al.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[12]  D. Durocher,et al.  Rnf8 deficiency impairs class switch recombination, spermatogenesis, and genomic integrity and predisposes for cancer , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[13]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  Class switching and meiotic defects in mice lacking the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF8 , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  M. Barcellos-Hoff,et al.  Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization. , 2010, Mutation research.

[15]  M. Stucki,et al.  MDC1: The art of keeping things in focus , 2010, Chromosoma.

[16]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The cellular response to DNA damage: a focus on MDC1 and its interacting proteins. , 2010, Nucleus.

[17]  A. Houtsmuller,et al.  Nuclear proteins: finding and binding target sites in chromatin , 2010, Chromosome Research.

[18]  N. Lowndes,et al.  MRN and the race to the break , 2010, Chromosoma.

[19]  Eleni P. Mimitou,et al.  DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. , 2009, DNA repair.

[20]  T. Cremer,et al.  The live cell irradiation and observation setup at SNAKE , 2009 .

[21]  J. Aten,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) An ultrasoft X-ray multi-microbeam irradiation system for studies of DNA damage responses by fixed-and live-cell fluorescence microscopy , 2009 .

[22]  Karl Otto Greulich,et al.  Laser microbeams and optical tweezers in ageing research. , 2009, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[23]  Zhefu Ma,et al.  Disassembly of MDC1 Foci Is Controlled by Ubiquitin-Proteasome-dependent Degradation* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  S. Botchway,et al.  Induction of Persistent Double Strand Breaks Following Multiphoton Irradiation of Cycling and G1‐arrested Mammalian Cells—Replication‐induced Double Strand Breaks , 2008, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[25]  G. Taucher‐Scholz,et al.  The Absence of an Early Calcium Response to Heavy-Ion Radiation in Mammalian Cells , 2008, Radiation research.

[26]  J. Egly,et al.  Tools to study DNA repair: what's in the box? , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[27]  T. Cremer,et al.  Competition effect in DNA damage response , 2008, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[28]  Burkhard Jakob,et al.  Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  Jeroen A. A. Demmers,et al.  Dynamic assembly of end-joining complexes requires interaction between Ku70/80 and XRCC4 , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  T. Cremer,et al.  DNA-repair protein distribution along the tracks of energetic ions. , 2006, Radiation Protection Dosimetry.

[31]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  F. Alt,et al.  MDC1 maintains genomic stability by participating in the amplification of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[33]  M. Yaffe,et al.  MDC1 Directly Binds Phosphorylated Histone H2AX to Regulate Cellular Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks , 2005, Cell.

[34]  J. Glover,et al.  Structure of the BRCT Repeat Domain of MDC1 and Its Specificity for the Free COOH-terminal End of the γ-H2AX Histone Tail* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  S. Bekker-Jensen,et al.  Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1 , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  T. Cremer,et al.  Microirradiation of cells with energetic heavy ions. , 2005, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[37]  Christopher J Bakkenist,et al.  Initiating Cellular Stress Responses , 2004, Cell.

[38]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Mdc1 couples DNA double‐strand break recognition by Nbs1 with its H2AX‐dependent chromatin retention , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[39]  R. Bonner,et al.  Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[40]  M Scholz,et al.  Biological Imaging of Heavy Charged-Particle Tracks , 2003, Radiation research.

[41]  Xingzhi Xu,et al.  NFBD1/KIAA0170 Is a Chromatin-associated Protein Involved in DNA Damage Signaling Pathways* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  J. Bartek,et al.  MDC1 is required for the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint , 2003, Nature.

[43]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint , 2003, Nature.

[44]  Phang-lang Chen,et al.  NFBD1, a Novel Nuclear Protein with Signature Motifs of FHA and BRCT, and an Internal 41-Amino Acid Repeat Sequence, Is an Early Participant in DNA Damage Response* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  T. Cremer,et al.  A new system for laser‐UVA‐microirradiation of living cells , 2003, Journal of microscopy.

[46]  H. Kitao,et al.  Regulation of Ionizing Radiation-induced Rad52 Nuclear Foci Formation by c-Abl-mediated Phosphorylation* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Wim Vermeulen,et al.  Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[48]  T. Halazonetis,et al.  P53 Binding Protein 1 (53bp1) Is an Early Participant in the Cellular Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  N. Maizels,et al.  Coordinated response of mammalian Rad51 and Rad52 to DNA damage , 2000, EMBO reports.

[50]  H. Hauser,et al.  Dicistronic transcription units for gene expression in mammalian cells. , 1993, Gene.