Integrated oral bioavailability projection using in vitro screening data as a selection tool in drug discovery.

The objective of the analysis described herein is to examine the in vitro/in vivo relationship of estimated bioavailability values and also the applicability of the estimated in vitro bioavailability to lead candidate selection in drug discovery. To this end, in vitro ADME data from screening assays as well as in vivo rat pharmacokinetic (PK) data were compiled for 140 compounds across therapeutic areas from the Pfizer library in Ann Arbor. The compounds span a broad range of structural types, including neutral, basic, and acidic compounds. Solubility and Caco-2 permeability data from in vitro ADME screening were used to calculate the fraction dose absorbed (FDp) using the physiologically based IDEA model. In vitro metabolic stability (t(1/2)) from human and rat liver microsomal incubations was converted to an in vitro intrinsic clearance value (CL(int)'), which was then scaled up to reflect in vivo clearance (CL) and hepatic extraction as described by Obach et al. [J. Pharmcol. Exp. Ther. 283 (1997) 46]. Subsequently, the in vitro/in vivo relationship between the measured bioavailability (F(obs)) in rats and the estimated bioavailability (F(est)) from FDp and predicted CL values was examined. The observed data suggest that compounds with low estimated in vitro bioavailability (F(est)<15%) are more likely to have low in vivo bioavailability (F(obs)<30%). Therefore, the present study indicates that in vitro estimation of bioavailability is an efficient tool to eliminate compounds having low bioavailability prior to in vivo characterization and therefore can be used to reduce attrition due to poor ADME properties in drug development.

[1]  Patrick Poulin,et al.  Utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models to drug development and rational drug discovery candidate selection. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[2]  Gerd Folkers,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Profiling in Drug Research: Biological, Physicochemical, and Computational Strategies , 2006 .

[3]  A. Beresford,et al.  ADME/PK as part of a rational approach to drug discovery. , 2000, Drug discovery today.

[4]  John Hodgson,et al.  ADMET—turning chemicals into drugs , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Hyunyoung Jeong,et al.  Evaluation of Using Dog as an Animal Model to Study the Fraction of Oral Dose Absorbed of 43 Drugs in Humans , 2000, Pharmaceutical Research.

[6]  Patrick Poulin,et al.  Prediction of pharmacokinetics prior to in vivo studies. 1. Mechanism-based prediction of volume of distribution. , 2002, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  C. Kibbey,et al.  An integrated process for measuring the physicochemical properties of drug candidates in a preclinical discovery environment. , 2001, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  H. van de Waterbeemd,et al.  Property-based design: optimization of drug absorption and pharmacokinetics. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  Thierry Lavé,et al.  Prediction of intestinal absorption: comparative assessment of GASTROPLUS and IDEA. , 2002, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[10]  W. Hauck,et al.  Interpatient variability in bioavailability is related to the extent of absorption: Implications for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies , 1996, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[11]  G. Flynn,et al.  Solubility of organic hydrochlorides. , 1972, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[12]  Y. Ishii,et al.  A convenient in vitro screening method for predicting in vivo drug metabolic clearance using isolated hepatocytes suspended in serum. , 2000, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[13]  C. Lipinski Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. , 2000, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[14]  G Mannens,et al.  Strategies for absorption screening in drug discovery and development. , 2001, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[15]  R. Obach,et al.  Prediction of human clearance of twenty-nine drugs from hepatic microsomal intrinsic clearance data: An examination of in vitro half-life approach and nonspecific binding to microsomes. , 1999, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[16]  S. Walker,et al.  Pharmaceutical innovation by the seven UK-owned pharmaceutical companies (1964-1985). , 1988, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[17]  S. Venkatesh,et al.  Role of the development scientist in compound lead selection and optimization. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[18]  J. Dressman,et al.  Influence of physicochemical properties on dissolution of drugs in the gastrointestinal tract. , 1997, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[19]  Y. Sugiyama,et al.  Prediction of human hepatic clearance from in vivo animal experiments and in vitro metabolic studies with liver microsomes from animals and humans. , 2001, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[20]  A. Barve,et al.  Linear Correlation of the Fraction of Oral Dose Absorbed of 64 Drugs Between Humans and Rats , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.

[21]  D. Jaeck,et al.  The Use of Human Hepatocytes to Select Compounds Based on Their Expected Hepatic Extraction Ratios in Humans , 1997, Pharmaceutical Research.

[22]  D J Rance,et al.  The prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters from preclinical and in vitro metabolism data. , 1997, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.