Changes in Circulating Tumor DNA Reflect Clinical Benefit Across Multiple Studies of Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

PURPOSE As immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) become increasingly used in frontline settings, identifying early indicators of response is needed. Recent studies suggest a role for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in monitoring response to ICI, but uncertainty exists in the generalizability of these studies. Here, the role of ctDNA for monitoring response to ICI is assessed through a standardized approach by assessing clinical trial data from five independent studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patient-level clinical and ctDNA data were pooled and harmonized from 200 patients across five independent clinical trials investigating the treatment of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)–directed monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. CtDNA levels were measured using different ctDNA assays across the studies. Maximum variant allele frequencies were calculated using all somatic tumor-derived variants in each unique patient sample to correlate ctDNA changes with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS We observed strong associations between reductions in ctDNA levels from on-treatment liquid biopsies with improved OS (OS; hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.62 to 3.20; P < .001) and PFS (PFS; hazard ratio 1.76; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.36; P < .001). Changes in the maximum variant allele frequencies ctDNA values showed strong association across different outcomes. CONCLUSION In this pooled analysis of five independent clinical trials, consistent and robust associations between reductions in ctDNA and outcomes were found across multiple end points assessed in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer treated with an ICI. Additional tumor types, stages, and drug classes should be included in future analyses to further validate this. CtDNA may serve as an important tool in clinical development and an early indicator of treatment benefit.

[1]  Sharyn I. Katz,et al.  Serial Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA by Next-Generation Gene Sequencing as a Biomarker of Response and Survival in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Receiving Pembrolizumab-Based Therapy , 2021, JCO precision oncology.

[2]  Yanxi Han,et al.  Choosing tumor mutational burden wisely for immunotherapy: A hard road to explore. , 2020, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer.

[3]  Song Wu,et al.  Prognostic and predictive impact of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced cancers treated with immune checkpoint blockade. , 2020, Cancer discovery.

[4]  Trevor J Pugh,et al.  Personalized circulating tumor DNA analysis as a predictive biomarker in solid tumor patients treated with pembrolizumab , 2020, Nature Cancer.

[5]  K. O'Byrne,et al.  Nivolumab + ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Three-year update from CheckMate 227 Part 1. , 2020 .

[6]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Circulating tumor DNA dynamics predict benefit from consolidation immunotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer , 2020, Nature Cancer.

[7]  D. Gandara,et al.  An exploratory analysis of on-treatment ctDNA measurement as a potential surrogate for overall survival for atezolizumab benefit in the OAK study , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[8]  Nicole J. Lambert,et al.  Early Assessment of Molecular Progression and Response by Whole-genome Circulating Tumor DNA in Advanced Solid Tumors , 2019, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[9]  N. Reinmuth,et al.  Atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower130): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  C. Rolfo,et al.  The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Lung Cancer: Mutational Analysis, Diagnosis, and Surveillance Now and into the Future , 2019, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[11]  M. Ignatiadis,et al.  Promises and Pitfalls of Using Liquid Biopsy for Precision Medicine. , 2019, Cancer research.

[12]  H. Aerts,et al.  Predicting response to cancer immunotherapy using noninvasive radiomic biomarkers , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  N. Normanno,et al.  Circulating free tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): clinical application and future perspectives. , 2019, Journal of thoracic disease.

[14]  R. Scharpf,et al.  Dynamics of Tumor and Immune Responses during Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2018, Cancer research.

[15]  C. Nieder,et al.  Tobacco smoking and cessation and PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a review of the literature , 2018, ESMO Open.

[16]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  A. Gupta,et al.  Early Reduction in ctDNA Predicts Survival in Patients with Lung and Bladder Cancer Treated with Durvalumab , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  Federico Cappuzzo,et al.  Atezolizumab for First‐Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  S. Novello,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Maximilian Diehn,et al.  Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. , 2018, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[21]  Abhijit A. Patel,et al.  Early Assessment of Lung Cancer Immunotherapy Response via Circulating Tumor DNA , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  J. Abrams,et al.  Toxicities associated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy: The Karmanos Cancer Center experience. , 2017 .

[23]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[24]  James D. Brenton,et al.  Liquid biopsies come of age: towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA , 2017, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[25]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  M. Burotto,et al.  Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Martin L. Miller,et al.  Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non–small cell lung cancer , 2015, Science.

[28]  S. Ren,et al.  Peripheral Blood for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Detection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients , 2014, Translational oncology.

[29]  Y. Kukita,et al.  Quantitative Identification of Mutant Alleles Derived from Lung Cancer in Plasma Cell-Free DNA via Anomaly Detection Using Deep Sequencing Data , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[31]  P. V. Rao,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data , 2000 .

[32]  M. LeBlanc,et al.  Survival Trees by Goodness of Split , 1993 .

[33]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[34]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.