Interhemispheric cooperation for familiar but not unfamiliar face processing

Evidence for interhemispheric cooperation during language processing has been demonstrated for words, but not for meaningless pseudowords. Specifically, responses were found to be faster and more accurate when identical copies of a word were presented bilaterally to both hemispheres, relative to unilateral single presentations. This bilateral advantage for words seems to be a robust effect in normals. The present study addressed the question of whether the bilateral advantage is restricted to lexical material or whether it is a more global phenomenon occurring for meaningful material in general. Thirty healthy participants performed a familiarity decision in which one copy of familiar and unfamiliar faces was presented tachistoscopically to the right visual hemifield (RVF), the left visual hemifield (LVF) or simultaneously to both visual hemifields (bilateral condition, BVF). We obtained a highly significant familiarity by visual field interaction(P < 0.006) showing that only for familiar faces, a bilateral advantage was obtained. Unfamiliar face processing did not yield a bilateral advantage. We conclude that interhemispheric cooperation only occurs for meaningful material for which cortical representations can be assumed.

[1]  A. Young,et al.  Aspects of face processing , 1986 .

[2]  M. Jeeves,et al.  Bilateral field advantage and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission in commissurotomy and callosal agenesis , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  F. Attneave,et al.  The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory , 1949 .

[4]  Jacqueline Liederman,et al.  Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Interhemispheric cooperation during lexical processing is mediated by the corpus callosum: Evidence from the split-brain , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Effects of perceptual quality on the processing of human faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres. , 1984 .

[7]  G. Berlucchi Two hemispheres but one brain , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  W. Hartje,et al.  The Bilateral Effect: Callosal Inhibition or Intrahemispheric Competition? , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Opposite superiorities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in discriminative reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material. , 1971, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[11]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  The Concept of Transcortical Cell Assemblies: a Key to the Understanding of Cortical Lateralization and Interhemispheric Interaction , 1996, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[12]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Bihemispheric processing of redundant bilateral lexical information. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[13]  Marks Nl,et al.  Effects of bilateral stimulation and stimulus redundancy on interhemispheric interaction. , 1999 .

[14]  M. Girelli,et al.  Neural Site of the Redundant Target Effect: Electrophysiological Evidence , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Redundancy gains and costs in cognitive processing: effects of short stimulus onset asynchronies. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Multiple simultaneous stimulus presentation facilitates lexical processing , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  R. B. Freeman,et al.  Memory search for faces and digits in patients with unilateral brain lesions. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[18]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. , 1995 .

[19]  G. Berlucchi,et al.  Right visual field superiority for accuracy of recognition of famous faces in normals , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Contributions of stimulus encoding and memory search to right hemisphere superiority in face recognition: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  G. Rhodes Lateralized processes in face recognition. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[22]  Aysenil Belger,et al.  Interhemispheric Interaction: How Do the Hemispheres Divide and Conquer a Task? , 1990, Cortex.

[23]  A. Young,et al.  Familiarity decisions for faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  D. Boles What bilateral displays do , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Koivisto Interhemispheric interaction in semantic categorization of pictures. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  J Theeuwes,et al.  The effects of location cuing on redundant-target processing , 1994, Psychological research.

[28]  Friedemann Pulverm Uuml,et al.  Words in the brain's language , 1999 .

[29]  A. Young,et al.  Face processing, laterality and contrast sensitivity , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Metacontrol of hemispheric function in human split-brain patients. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  M. Banich,et al.  The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[35]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[36]  Bettina Mohr,et al.  Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  J Sergent Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  K. Henke,et al.  Subliminal perception of words and faces. , 1994, The International journal of neuroscience.

[39]  S. Dimond,et al.  Processing in perceptual integration between and within the cerebral hemispheres. , 1972, British journal of psychology.

[40]  J. Hellige,et al.  Processing from LVF, RVF and BILATERAL presentations: Examinations of metacontrol and interhemispheric interaction , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[41]  M. Moscovitch Afferent and efferent models of visual perceptual asymmetries: Theoretical and empirical implications , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Fate of neglected targets: a chronometric analysis of redundant target effects in the bisected brain. , 1995 .