Serologic Evidence for Reactivation of Cryptococcosis in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients

ABSTRACT Cryptococcosis is a significant infection with a high mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients. Nonetheless, the pathogenesis of this disease is poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that cryptococcosis may result from either primary infection or reactivation of a latent infection. Sera were obtained from transplant recipients prior to transplantation and at the time they developed cryptococcosis. Control sera were obtained before and after transplant from patients who did not develop cryptococcosis. Sera were tested for antibodies against Cryptococcus neoformans by using an immunoblot assay. Antibody responses were also compared with those observed in sera from rats with experimental pulmonary cryptococcosis. In all, 52% of the transplant recipients who developed cryptococcosis exhibited serologic evidence of cryptococcal infection before transplantation. These patients developed cryptococcosis significantly earlier after transplant than patients without preexisting reactivity did (5.6 ± 3.4 months compared to 40.6 ± 63.8 months, respectively [P = 0.0011]). The results from our study suggest that a substantial proportion of transplant-associated cryptococcosis cases result from the reactivation of a latent infection. These findings also highlight the potential utility of serologic studies in identifying patients at risk for the development of cryptococcosis after transplantation.

[1]  R. Haugen,et al.  The pulmonary lesions in cryptococcosis with special reference to subpleural nodules. , 1954, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  A. Casadevall,et al.  Antibody Response to Cryptococcus neoformans Proteins in Rodents and Humans , 1999, Infection and Immunity.

[3]  Nina Singh,et al.  Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients: variables influencing clinical characteristics and outcome. , 2001, Emerging infectious diseases.

[4]  A. Casadevall,et al.  Serologic evidence for Cryptococcus neoformans infection in early childhood. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[5]  F. Bistoni,et al.  Humoral response against Cryptococcus neoformans mannoprotein antigens in HIV‐infected patients , 2003, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[6]  A. Casadevall,et al.  Persistent Cryptococcus neoformansPulmonary Infection in the Rat Is Associated with Intracellular Parasitism, Decreased Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression, and Altered Antibody Responsiveness to Cryptococcal Polysaccharide , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[7]  F. Dromer,et al.  Epidemiological Evidence for Dormant Cryptococcus neoformans Infection , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  A. Casadevall,et al.  Evidence of Zoonotic Transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans from a Pet Cockatoo to an Immunocompromised Patient , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  R. Seaton,et al.  Recognition of cytoplasmic yeast antigens of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans and Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii by immune human sera. , 1997, FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology.

[10]  J. Reyes,et al.  Cryptococcal meningitis after liver transplantation. , 1996, Transplantation.

[11]  J. Heitman,et al.  Cryptococcus neoformans in organ transplant recipients: impact of calcineurin-inhibitor agents on mortality. , 2007, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[12]  A. Casadevall,et al.  MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASE-9 AND TISSUE INHIBITORS OF METALLOPROTEINASES 1 IN INFLUENZA-ASSOCIATED ENCEPHALOPATHY , 2007, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.