Effect of antibody orientation on immunosorbent performance

The impact of antibody orientation on immunosorbent efficiency was quantitatively assessed. A pH‐dependent murine monoclonal antibody (Mab) against human protein C (hPC), recombinant hPC (rhPC) and two different immobilization chemistries and matrices were used as model systems. The lysyl groups of the rhPC were covalently modified with an acetic acid ester of N‐hydroxysuccinimide and this modified rhPC was used as a Fab masking agent (FMA). The FMA was used to mask the antigen binding regions (Fab) of the Mab prior to and during covalent immobilization. Thereafter, the residual active sites of the support were inactivated and the FMA was removed. Mab was immobilizeed at low bead‐averaged densities of about 0.4–1.1 mg Mab/mL matrix to minimize local density effects. Immunosorbents made using masked Mab (oriented coupling) gave antigen binding efficiencies (nAg) of 42–48% compared with 18–22% for those made by random coupling. The amount of (Fab)2 released from pepsin digestion of immunosorbents was about 3–4‐fold higher for matrices having been made with FMA‐masked Mab relative to unmasked Mab. Thus, the (Fab)2 accessibility to pepsin correlates well with higher functional efficiency (nAg) and serves as a measure of orientation. In summary, at low Mab density and a 2:1 molar rhPC to Mab binding stoichiometry, about 80% or more of the Mab randomly coupled through amino moieties was improperly oriented relative to oriented coupled Mab, which correlated with about 50% of lost Mab functionality upon immobilization.

[1]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[2]  C. Anfinsen,et al.  [31] Affinity chromatography , 1971 .

[3]  D. Davies,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Structure at 6 a Resolution of a Human γG1 Immunoglobulin Molecule , 1971, The Journal of Immunology.

[4]  J. Turková,et al.  Affinity chromatography. , 1974, Journal of chromatography.

[5]  S. Snyder,et al.  An improved 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid method for the determination of amines. , 1975, Analytical biochemistry.

[6]  W. Hancock,et al.  Application of 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole-activated matrices for the purification of proteins. III. The use of 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole-activated agaroses in the biospecific affinity chromatographic isolation of serum antibodies. , 1981, Journal of chromatography.

[7]  M. Greaves,et al.  A one-step purification of membrane proteins using a high efficiency immunomatrix. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  M Karplus,et al.  Molecular anatomy of the antibody binding site. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  M. Wilchek,et al.  [1] Affinity chromatography , 1984 .

[10]  M. Hearn Application of 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole-activated matrices for the purification of proteins. IX. Dynamic multizoning effects in biospecific affinity chromatography on porous supports: evaluation of activation and ligand coupling effects with different support materials. , 1986, Journal of chromatography.

[11]  S. Roy,et al.  Large-scale purification of recombinant human leukocyte interferons. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[12]  Y. Takeda,et al.  A novel covalent modification of antibodies at their amino groups with retention of antigen-binding activity. , 1987, Journal of immunological methods.

[13]  D. O'Shannessy,et al.  Site‐Directed Immobilization of Glycoproteins on Hydrazide‐Containing Solid Supports , 1987, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[14]  D. Strickland,et al.  Conformational changes in an epitope localized to the NH2-terminal region of protein C. Evidence for interaction of protein C domains. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  D. Strickland,et al.  Process Implications for Metal‐Dependent Immunoaffinity Interactions , 1989 .

[16]  S. Heilmann,et al.  Immobilization of Protein A at high density on azlactone-functional polymeric beads and their use in affinity chromatography , 1990 .

[17]  G. Hermanson,et al.  Site-directed immobilization of proteins. , 1990, Journal of chromatography.

[18]  W. Drohan,et al.  Effect of feed flow-rate, antigen concentration and antibody density on immunoaffinity purification of coagulation factor IX. , 1990, Journal of chromatography.

[19]  B. Solomon,et al.  Oriented immobilization of periodateoxidized monoclonal antibodies on amino and hydrazide derivatives of eupergit C , 1990, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[20]  E. Hadas,et al.  Enhanced activity of immobilized dimethylmaleic anhydride-protected poly- and monoclonal antibodies. , 1990, Journal of chromatography.

[21]  W. Velander,et al.  Comparison of the performance of immunosorbents prepared by site-directed or random coupling of monoclonal antibodies. , 1991, Journal of chromatography.

[22]  A. Subramanian,et al.  The use of Fab‐masking antigens to enhance the activity of immobilized antibodies , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  W. Velander,et al.  Optimization of pressure-flow limits, strength, intraparticle transport and dynamic capacity by hydrogel solids content and bead size in cellulose immunosorbents , 1993 .

[24]  F. Gwazdauskas,et al.  The Porcine Mammary Gland as a Bioreactor for Complex Proteinsa , 1994, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  William H. Velander,et al.  Role of local antibody density effects on immunosorbent efficiency , 1994 .