Selecting Errors for Selective Error Correction

If one accepts the standard view that error correction in second language classes should be selective rather than comprehensive, the question naturally arises of how the selection process should be carried out. The paper explores this question by asking which types of errors are most likely to be eliminated or reduced by means of correction; in other words, which are most correctable. The focus is on (a) practical problems affecting the success of correction and (b) existing empirical work on the effectiveness of correction. The major conclusion is that the most correctable errors are those that involve simple problems in relatively discrete items. Least correctable are those stemming from problems in a complex system, particularly the syntactic system. Grammar errors in general are not good targets, though certain types can be identified that are more promising than others. These conclusions are developed in detail in the paper, with numerous examples.

[1]  Barbara Kroll.  Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom. , 1990 .

[2]  Harriet D. Semke.  Effects of the Red Pen , 1984 .

[3]  John Turscott.  What's Wrong with Oral Grammar Correction. , 1999 .

[4]  Bill VanPatten,et al.  Second Language Adquisition Research and the Learning/Teaching of Spanish: Some Research Finding and Implications , 1986 .

[5]  Charlene Polio,et al.  “If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions , 1998 .

[6]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Toward Assessing Interlanguage Performance: The Relationship between Selected Errors, Learners' Characteristics, and Learners' Explanations. , 1976 .

[7]  Ken Sheppard.  Two Feedback Types: Do They Make A Difference? , 1992 .

[8]  J. Truscott.  The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris , 1999 .

[9]  Yang Qi.  ERROR ANALYSIS AND ERROR CORRECTION IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING , 2002 .

[10]  J. Truscott,et al.  Noticing in second language acquisition: a critical review , 1998 .

[11]  J. Hedgcock,et al.  Teaching ESL composition : purpose, process, and practice , 2001 .

[12]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  SALIENCE OF FEEDBACK ON ERROR AND ITS EFFECT ON EFL WRITING QUALITY , 1986 .

[13]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Can Syntax be Taught? A Study of the Effects of Formal Instruction on the Acquisition of WH Questions by Children , 1984 .

[14]  Christine Goring. Kepner.  An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills , 1991 .

[15]  H Doherty,et al.  "If only I had more time". , 1982, Dentalpractice.

[16]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  The Role of Lexical Aspect in the Acquisition of Tense and Aspect , 1995 .

[17]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[18]  John Truscott,et al.  Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .

[19]  K. Bardovi-Harlig.  Another Piece of the Puzzle: The Emergence of the Present Perfect. , 1997 .

[20]  R. Dekeyser.  The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency , 1993 .

[21]  B. D. Schwartz.  On Explicit and Negative Data Effecting and Affecting Competence and Linguistic Behavior , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[22]  Michael Sharwood Smith,et al.  Input Enhancement in Instructed SLA , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[23]  B. Vanpatten.  The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines: Implications for Grammatical Accuracy in the Classroom? , 1986, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[24]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Structural Syllabus and Second Language Acquisition , 1993 .

[25]  Ilona Leki,et al.  Second Language Writing: Coaching from the margins: issues in written response , 1990 .

[26]  Michael H. Long,et al.  An introduction to second language acquisition research , 1990 .

[27]  J. Truscott.  What's Wrong with Oral Grammar Correction , 1999 .