Event-driven adaptive intermittent control applied to a rotational pendulum

Intermittent control combines open-loop trajectories with feedback at discrete time instances determined by events. Among other applications, it has recently been used to model quiet standing in humans where the system was assumed to be time-invariant. This article expands this work to the time-variant case by introducing an adaptive intermittent controller that exploits the well-known self-tuning architecture of adaptive control with a Kalman filter to perform online state and parameter estimation. Simulation and experimental results using a rotational inverted pendulum show advantages of the intermittent controllers compared to continuous feedback control since the former can provide persistent excitation due to their internal triggering mechanism, even when no external reference changes or disturbances are applied. Moreover, the results show that the event thresholds of intermittent control can be used to adjust the degree of responsiveness of the adaptation in the system, becoming a tool to balance the trade-off between steady-state performance and flexibility against parametric changes, addressing the stability–plasticity dilemma of adaptation and learning in control.

[1]  Ian David Loram,et al.  Intermittent control models of human standing: similarities and differences , 2014, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  P. Gawthrop,et al.  Human stick balancing: an intermittent control explanation , 2013, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Refractoriness in Sustained Visuo-Manual Control: Is the Refractory Duration Intrinsic or Does It Depend on External System Properties? , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Intermittent tapping control , 2012, J. Syst. Control. Eng..

[5]  Henrik Gollee,et al.  Identification of intermittent control in man and machine , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  The system-matched hold and the intermittent control separation principle , 2011, Int. J. Control.

[7]  Henrik Gollee,et al.  Human control of an inverted pendulum: Is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological? , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Event-driven intermittent control , 2009, Int. J. Control.

[10]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Constrained intermittent model predictive control , 2009, Int. J. Control.

[11]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Intermittent Predictive Control of an Inverted Pendulum , 2006 .

[12]  Yalchin Oytam,et al.  Degrees of freedom and motor planning in purposive movement. , 2005, Human movement science.

[13]  Ian David Loram,et al.  Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: position control by small, ballistic‐like, throw and catch movements , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Rogelio Lozano,et al.  Non-linear Control for Underactuated Mechanical Systems , 2001 .

[15]  S. Haykin Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks , 2001 .

[16]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Open-loop intermittent feedback control: practical continuous-time GPC , 1999 .

[17]  P D Neilson,et al.  Influence of intermittency and synergy on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[18]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  The ART of adaptive pattern recognition by a self-organizing neural network , 1988, Computer.