PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity

Does visual working memory represent a fixed number of objects, or is capacity reduced as object complexity increases? We measured accuracy in detecting changes between sample and test displays and found that capacity estimates dropped as complexity increased. However, these apparent capacity reductions were strongly correlated with increases in sample-test similarity (r = .97), raising the possibility that change detection was limited by errors in comparing the sample and test, rather than by the number of items that were maintained in working memory. Accordingly, when sample-test similarity was low, capacity estimates for even the most complex objects were equivalent to the estimate for the simplest objects (r = .88), suggesting that visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Finally, a correlational analysis suggested a two-factor model of working memory ability, in which the number and resolution of representations in working memory correspond to distinct dimensions of memory ability.

[1]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[2]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[3]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[5]  D. E. Irwin Memory for position and identity across eye movements. , 1992 .

[6]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[8]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[9]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  J. Jay Todd,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004, Nature.

[12]  E. Vogel,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[13]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[14]  Hing Yee Eng,et al.  Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli. , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Michael S. Ambinder,et al.  Change blindness , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.